1 karl 1.1.2.1 Using the CIM/XML Pull Operations
2
3 STATUS
4
|
5 karl 1.1.2.4 <<< The TODO section is being maintained during the review and checkin process
|
6 karl 1.1.2.1 to keep track of problems, errors, notes, etc. Must be deleted before
7 checkin to head of tree. Please feel free to add notes, etc in this
8 section as you review/test.>>>>>>
9
|
10 karl 1.1.2.3
|
11 karl 1.1.2.4 TODO list:
|
12 karl 1.1.2.3 1. Binary operation from OOP. Need to add counter to binary
13 protocol to be able to count objects in response. Generates
14 warnings in things like messageserializer and does not work with
15 OOP right now.
|
16 karl 1.1.2.4 2. OpenExecQuery - Code is incorrect in that it used InstancesWithPath
17 where the spec is instances with no path. Need new function to wrap
18 getInstanceElement(withoutPathElement) in XmlReader. Note that
19 Alternate is to put flag on InstancesWith Path to say no path
20 3. Code for Pull part of OpenQueryInstancesRequest a) should be part of
21 the common CIMOperationRequestDispatcher execCommon code.
22 4. The changes to WQLCIMOperationRequestDispatcher and CQL... for handling
23 pull not completed so we feed the responses back to the EnmerationContext
24 queues
|
25 karl 1.1.2.3 3. Lots of minor TODOs, etc.
|
26 karl 1.1.2.4 4. External runtime variables. Decide this as part of PEP. The variables
27 exist in CIMOperationRequestDispatcher but not in CIMConfig. The primary
28 ones to consider are:
29 a. System maxObjectCount. Setting some maximum size on what a pull
30 client can request (i.e. the maximum size of the maxObjectCount on
31 Open... and pull operations.
32 b. Pull interoperationTimeout (max times between operations). This is
33 the maximum number of seconds on the operationTimeout parameter of the
34 Open operations
35 c. Maximum size of the responseCache before it starts backing up
36 responses to the providers.
|
37 karl 1.1.2.3 5. Decision on EnumerationContext timeout (separate thread or just
|
38 karl 1.1.2.4 checks during other operations). Can we, in fact really keep the
39 enumeration context table and queue under control without monitoring
40 with a separate thread. We must monitor for:
41 a. Client operation that stop requesting (i.e. inter operation time
42 exceeds operationTimeout). Note that if it simply exceeds the time
43 the next operation does the cleanup. The issue is those clients that
44 simply stop and do not either close or go to completion.
45 b. We should protect against providers that no not every finish delivering
46 or take to long between deliveries. This does not exist in Pegasus
47 today
48 6. Clean up code in Dispatcher. The associators code is still real mess
49 and the pull code is in a template. The Pull code is good now but
50 must be duplicated. Look at creating new CIMMessage CIMPullResponseMessage
51 so that we can have common code. Everything is the same except what
52 goes into the CIMResponseData so it is logical to have completely
53 common processing
|
54 karl 1.1.2.3 7. Extension to avoid double move of objects in CIMResponseData (one
55 into enumerationContext queue and second to new cimResponseData for
56 response. Want to avoid second move by extending Open/Pull response
57 messages to include count and CIMResponse data to count objects out
58 of queue when converting (avoids the second move). Big issue here
59 with binary data since need to extend format to count it.
|
60 karl 1.1.2.4 8. Still using templates, etc. in code in the Dispatcher. This is for
61 all of the open operations where there is a lot of duplicate code
62 and the pull operations that are 99% duplicate code (in a single template)
63
64 Fixed for 9 June CVS update
65 1. Cleaned up code for OpenQueryInstances. Note that this is incomplete.
66 No support in WQL or CQL Operations
67 2.
68
69 What was fixed for 5 June checkin.
|
70 karl 1.1.2.3 1. Extended ResponseTest MOF for for both CMPI and C++ subclasses
71 2. Fixed issues with pullop.
72 3. Fixed temp issue with CIMResponseData size by putting in mutex. That
73 is not a permanent fix but it gets around issue probably in the control
74 of the move logic that meant counts were off.
75 4. Fixed issues in Dispatcher so that associator code works. Still messy
76 code in the dispatcher.
77 5. Changed name of Enumerationtable.h & cpp to EnumerationContextTable.*
78 6 Changed name of ResponseStressTest module, classes, etc.
79
80 TAG: TASK_PEP317_5JUNE_2013_2
81
|
82 karl 1.1.2.2 2 June 2013
|
83 karl 1.1.2.1
84 Issues - KS
85 1. have not installed the binary move in CIMResponseData. Please run
86 with OPP off.
87 2. Some problem in the processing so we are getting server crashes.
88 Right no I am guessing that this is in the binaryCodec and am going to
89 expand the test tools to allow testing through the localhost.
90
91 3. Still way to many TODO and KS comments and KS_TEMPS. Removing bit by bit.
92
93 4. Env variable connection for the config parameters not installed.
94
95 5. Issue with the threaded timer. For some reason during tests it
96 eventually calls the timer thread with trash for the parm (which is
97 pointer to the EnumerationTable object). Caught because we do a valid
98 test at beginning of the function.
99
|
100 karl 1.1.2.2 6. Still using the templates in CIMOperationRequestDispatcher to simplify
101 the handle... processing.
102
103 7. I think I have a way around the double move of objects in the
104 EnumerationContext so that the outputter will just take a defined number
105 of objects directly from the gathering cache and save the second move.
106
107 8. Not yet passing all tests but getting closer now.
108
109 9. Created a tag before this commit TASK_PEP317_1JUNE_2013.
110
111 10. Next Tag will be TASK_PEP317_2_JUNE_2013 in the task branch
112
113
|
114 karl 1.1.2.1 ===========================================
115
116 OVERVIEW:
117
118 The operation extensions for pull operations defined in the DMTF specification
119 DSP0200 V 1.4 were implemented in Pegasus effective Pegasus version 2.11
120 including Client and Server.
121
122 These operations extend the CIM/XML individual operations to operation
123 sequences where the server must maintain state between operations in a
124 sequence and the client must execute multiple operations to get the full
125 set of instances or instance paths.
126
127 The following new CIM/XML operations as defined in DSP0200 are included;
128
129 -OpenEnumerateInstances
130 -openEnumerateInstancePaths
131 -OpenReferenceInstances
132 -OpenReferenceInstancePaths
133 -OpenAssociatiorInstances
134 -OpenAssociatorInstancePaths
135 karl 1.1.2.1 -PullInstancesWithPath
136 -PullInstancePaths
137 -CloseEnumeration
138 -EnumerationCount
|
139 karl 1.1.2.2 OpenExecQuery
|
140 karl 1.1.2.1
141 The following operations have not been implemented in this version of Pegasus:
142
143 -OpenQueryInstances
144
145 The following limitations on the implementation exist;
146
147 1. The filterQueryLanguage and filterQuery parameters are processed by
148 the Pegasus client but the server returns error if there is any data in
|
149 karl 1.1.2.2 either parameter. This work does not include the development of the
150 query language. Note that a separate effort to extend Pegasus to use
151 the DMTF FQL query language is in process.
|
152 karl 1.1.2.1
153 2. The input parameter continueOnError is processed correctly by the client
154 but the Pegasus server only provides for false since the server does not
155 include logic to continue processing responses after an error is
156 encountered.
157 This is consistent with the statement in the specification that use of
158 this functionality is optional and the fact that the DMTF agrees that all
159 of the issues of continuing after errors have not been clarified.
160
161 3. The operation enumerationCount is not processed by the server today since
162 a) really getting the count would be the same cost as the corresponding
163 enumeration, b) the server does not include a history or estimating
164 mechanism for this to date.
|
165 karl 1.1.2.2 NOTE: After a through review as part of the development of the next version
166 of CMPI we have concluded that this operation is probably not worth the
167 effort. Since it is optional, Pegasus will only return the unknown status
168 at this point
|
169 karl 1.1.2.1
170 Since the concept of sequences of operations linked together (open, pull, close)
171 is a major extension to the original CIM/XML operation concept of completely
172 independent operations several new pieces of functionality are implemented
173 to control interOperationTimeouts, counts of objects to be returned, etc.
174
175 TBD - Review this
176
177 CLIENT
178
179 The new operations follow the same pattern as the APIs for existing operations
180 in that:
181
182 1. All errors are handled as CIMException and Exception
183
184 2. The means of inputting parameters are the same except that there are
185 significantly more input parameters with the open operations and for the
186 first time operations return parameters as well as objects in the
187 response. Specifically the open and pull operations return values for
188 enumerationContext which is the identity for a pull sequence and
189 endOfSequence which is the marker the server sends in open and pull
190 karl 1.1.2.1 responses when it has no more objects to send.
191
192 The significant differences include:
193
194 1. Processing of parameters on responses (i.e. the endOfSequence and
195 enumerationContext parameters are returned for open and pull operations).
196
197 2. Numeric arguments (Uint32 and Uint64 include the option of NULL in some
198 cases so they are packaged inside classes Uint32Arg and Uint64Arg in the
199 client api.
200
201 3. The association and reference operations ONLY process instances. They do
202 not include the capability to return classes like reference and associator
203 do and therefore return CIMInstance rather than CIMObject.
204
205 4. Paths are returned in all cases (i.e OpenEnumerateInstances and
206 PullInstancesWithPath where they were not with EnumeratInstances.
207
208 5. The client must maintain state between operations in a sequence (using
209 the enumerationContext parameter).
210
211 karl 1.1.2.1 TBD- Are there more differences.
212
213
214 SERVER
215
216 The Pegasus server attempts to always deliver the requested number of objects
217 for any open or pull request (the specification allows for the server to
218 deliver less than the requested number of objects and specifically to return
219 zero objects on open). We felt that it was worth any extra cost in processing
220 to provide the client with exactly what it had requested.
221
222 The pegasus server always closes an enumeration sequence upon receipt of any
223 error from the providers, repository, etc. Therefore the server will reject
|
224 karl 1.1.2.2 any request that has continueOnError = true;
225
226 Expansion to allow the continue on error may be added in a future version.
227 In any case, the whole purpose of the continue on error is really to allow
228 input from good providers to be mixed with providers that return errors so
229 that generally this would mean simply changing the logic in the return mechanism
230 to not shutdown when an error is received from any given provider.
231
232 Generally we do not believe that the providers need to do much more in the
233 future to support the continueOnError other than possibly allowing the provider
234 to continue processing after it has received an error.
|
235 karl 1.1.2.1
236 PROVIDERS
237
238 This implementation requires NO changes to the existing providers. The
239 provider APIs operate just as they do with the original operations.
240
241 Because the server processing is different however, there may be some
242 behavior differences primarily because the client now controls the speed of
243 delivery of objects.
244
245 In previous versions of Pegasus, the server attempts to deliver objects as
246 rapidly as then can be put on the network. In the case of HTTP chunked requests
247 they are delivered in chunks of about 100 objects. The primary delay for the
248 providers was the processing of each segment through the server. The server
249 is blocked so that no other segment can proceed through the server until that
250 segment is processed and sent on the network.
251 In the case of non-chunkedresponses, they are completely gathered in the serve
252 and then delivered as one non-chunked response. There were no delays for the
253 providers, just lots of possible memory use in the server.
254
255 The responses from providers (delivered through the deliver(...) interface are
256 karl 1.1.2.1 gathered into segments of about 100 objects and this group of objects is moved
257 through the server to be delivered to the client.
258
259 However with the inclusion of the pull operations, The segments of objects
260 from the providers are cached in the server response path until the
261 maxObjectCount for that request (open or pull) and that number returned in a
262 non-chunked response. Thus, if the client is slow to issue pull requests,
263 the providers might be delayed at some point to reduce memory usage in the
264 server (the delay appears as slow response tothe deliver operation).
265
266 In other words, the time to process large sets of responses from the provider
267 now depends on the speed of handling the client.
268
269 It is important to remember in developing providers that the Pegasus server
270 can most efficiently process responses if they are passed from the provider
271 to the server individually or in small arrays of objects rather than the
272 provider gathering very large arrays of objects and sending them to the
273 server.
274
|
275 karl 1.1.2.2 NEXT GENERATION PROVIDERS
276 KS_TODO
277
|
278 karl 1.1.2.1 CONFIGURATION PARAMETERS
279
280 The server includes several configuration parameters to set limits on the
281 processing of pull operations. All of these configuration parameters are
282 compile time parameters rather than runtime.
283
284 1. Maximum value of minimum interoperation time. This parameter defines the
285 maximum time allowed between the return of an open or pull response and
286 the receipt of the next pull or a close operation before the server may
287 close the enumeration. The specification allows the server to set a
288 maximum interoperation time and refuse open requests that with requested
289 operationTimeout greater than that time.
290 CIM_ERR_INVALID_OPERATION_TIMEOUT
291
292 This value is set with the Pegasus environment variable
293 PEGASUS_PULL....
294
295 2. Maximum objects returned in a single open or pull operation. The server
296 can set a maximum limit on the number of objects that can be returned in
297 a single open or pull oepration with the maxObjectCount parameter.
298
299 karl 1.1.2.1 3. Whether the server allows 0 as an interoperation timeout value. The value
300 zero is s special value for the interoperationTimeout in that it tells the
301 server to not timeout any enumeration sequence.
302
303 With this value for interoperationTimeout, the only way to close an
304 enumeration sequence is to complete all of the pulls or issue the close.
305 If for some reason the sequence is not completed, that enumeration context
306 would remain open indefinitly. Since in Pegasus any open enumeration
307 context uses resources (the context object and any provider resposnes that
308 have not yet been issued in a response) it would appear that most
309 platforms would not want to allow the existence of enumeration contexts
310 that cannot be closed by the server.
311
312 4, maximum consecutive pull requests with 0 maxObjectCount. The use of the
313 pull operation with maxObjectCount set to zero could be used to keep an
314 enumeration context open indefinitly (this tells the server to restart the
315 interoperationTimeout but not send any objects in the response). Therefore the
316 specification allows for the server setting maximum limits on this behavior
317 and returning the error CIM_ERR_SERVER_LIMITS_EXCEEDED if this limit is
318 exceeded.
319 Note that this is maximum CONSECUTIVE pulls so that issuing a pull with
320 karl 1.1.2.1 a non-zero count resets this counter.
321
322 KS-TBD - Is this really logical since we can still block by just issuing
323 lots of zero request and an occansional request for one object.
324
325 Pegaus sets the value of this limit to 1000 and allows the implementer to
326 modify it with the PEGASUS_MAXIMUM_ZERO_OBJECTCOUNT environment variable.
327
328 5. Default operationTimeout -
329
330 The default of this parameter is to refuse operat
331
332 In the current release of Pegasus these are all compile time parameters.
|