1 a.dunfey 1.1 // ===================================================================
2 // Title: Network Routing and Forwarding Services
3 // $State: Preliminary $
4 // $Date: 2005/01/05 00:54:00 $
5 // $Source: /home/dmtf2/dotorg/var/cvs/repositories/dev/Schema/MOF/Network_RoutingForwarding.mof,v $
6 // $Revision: 1.4 $
7 // ===================================================================
8 //#pragma inLine ("Includes/copyright.inc")
9 // Copyright 1998-2005 Distributed Management Task Force, Inc. (DMTF).
10 // All rights reserved.
11 // DMTF is a not-for-profit association of industry members dedicated
12 // to promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability.
13 // DMTF specifications and documents may be reproduced for uses
14 // consistent with this purpose by members and non-members,
15 // provided that correct attribution is given.
16 // As DMTF specifications may be revised from time to time,
17 // the particular version and release date should always be noted.
18 //
19 // Implementation of certain elements of this standard or proposed
20 // standard may be subject to third party patent rights, including
21 // provisional patent rights (herein "patent rights"). DMTF makes
22 a.dunfey 1.1 // no representations to users of the standard as to the existence
23 // of such rights, and is not responsible to recognize, disclose, or
24 // identify any or all such third party patent right, owners or
25 // claimants, nor for any incomplete or inaccurate identification or
26 // disclosure of such rights, owners or claimants. DMTF shall have no
27 // liability to any party, in any manner or circumstance, under any
28 // legal theory whatsoever, for failure to recognize, disclose, or
29 // identify any such third party patent rights, or for such party's
30 // reliance on the standard or incorporation thereof in its product,
31 // protocols or testing procedures. DMTF shall have no liability to
32 // any party implementing such standard, whether such implementation
33 // is foreseeable or not, nor to any patent owner or claimant, and shall
34 // have no liability or responsibility for costs or losses incurred if
35 // a standard is withdrawn or modified after publication, and shall be
36 // indemnified and held harmless by any party implementing the
37 // standard from any and all claims of infringement by a patent owner
38 // for such implementations.
39 //
40 // For information about patents held by third-parties which have
41 // notified the DMTF that, in their opinion, such patent may relate to
42 // or impact implementations of DMTF standards, visit
43 a.dunfey 1.1 // http://www.dmtf.org/about/policies/disclosures.php.
44 //#pragma inLine
45 // ===================================================================
46 // Description: The Network Model extends the management concepts to
47 // represent protocol interfaces and network/protocol
48 // services. This file defines network routing and
49 // forwarding services.
50 //
51 // The object classes below are listed in an order that
52 // avoids forward references. Required objects, defined
53 // by other working groups, are omitted.
54 // ==================================================================
55 // Change Log for v2.7.1
56 // - Correct Min(1)->Min(0) overrides (should stay Min(1)) in
57 // HostedForwardingServices and HostedRoutingServices.
58 //
59 // Change Log for v2.7
60 // CR662 - Deprecate NetworkService and NetworkServicesInAdminDomain
61 // - Modify Descriptions of subclasses of NetworkService
62 // to clarify current status (RouteCalculationService and
63 // ForwardingService)
64 a.dunfey 1.1 // - Deprecate HostingRoutingServices, HostedForwardingService
65 // and LogicalNetworkService
66 // CR788 - Add the classes, RoutingProtocolDomain and RoutingProtocol
67 // DomainInAS, from the OSPF submission
68 // CR866 - Cleanup of the RoutingPolicy class
69 // CR982 - Removal of Experimental for preliminary to final
70 // CR983 - v2.7 Deprecations promoted to final
71 // CR1009 - Correct deprecation of NetworkService.ServiceURL
72 // Change Log for v2.8
73 // CR1128 - Change subclassing from CIM_Dependency to
74 // CIM_HostedDependency for identified classes. This is
75 // needed as a result of the introduction of HostedDependency
76 // by SysDev
77 //
78 // Change Log for V2.9
79 // No changes
80 // ===================================================================
81
82 #pragma Locale ("en_US")
83
84
85 a.dunfey 1.1 // ==================================================================
86 // NetworkService
87 // ==================================================================
88 [Deprecated { "CIM_Service" }, Abstract, Version ( "2.7.0" ),
89 Description (
90 "This is an abstract base class, derived from the Service "
91 "class. It is deprecated in Version 2.7 with the recommendation "
92 "that the Service class be subclassed instead. Distinguishing "
93 "between services that modify traffic versus supporting basic "
94 "communication has not proved useful.")]
95 class CIM_NetworkService : CIM_Service {
96
97 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
98 "This is a free-form array of strings that provide "
99 "descriptive words and phrases that can be used in queries. "
100 "To-date, this property has not been implemented, since it "
101 "is not standardized. Also, if this was a necessary query "
102 "construct, then it would be required higher in the "
103 "inheritance hierarchy. The latter has not proven necessary. "
104 "Therefore, the property is deprecated.")]
105 string Keywords [ ];
106 a.dunfey 1.1
107 [Deprecated { "CIM_ServiceAccessURI" }, Description (
108 "This is a URL that provides the protocol, network location, "
109 "and other service-specific information required in order to "
110 "access the service. It is deprecated with the "
111 "recommendation that ServiceAccessURI be instantiated "
112 "instead. This new class correctly positions the semantics "
113 "of the service access, and clarifies the format of the "
114 "information.")]
115 string ServiceURL;
116
117 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
118 "This is a free-form array of strings that specify any "
119 "specific pre-conditions that must be met in order for this "
120 "service to start correctly. It was expected that subclasses "
121 "would refine the inherited StartService() method to suit "
122 "their specific needs. To-date, this refinement has not been "
123 "necessary. Also, the property is not very useful, since it "
124 "is not standardized. If this was a necessary construct, "
125 "then it would be required higher in the inheritance "
126 "hierarchy (on Service). The latter has not proven true. "
127 a.dunfey 1.1 "Therefore, the property is deprecated.")]
128 string StartupConditions [ ];
129
130 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
131 "This is a free-form array of strings that specify any "
132 "specific parameters that must be supplied to the "
133 "StartService() method in order for this service to start "
134 "correctly. It was expected that subclasses would refine the "
135 "inherited StartService() methods to suit their specific "
136 "needs. To-date, this refinement has not been necessary. If "
137 "indeed the method were refined, then its parameters would "
138 "more formally convey this information. Therefore, the "
139 "property is deprecated.")]
140 string StartupParameters [ ];
141 };
142
143
144 // ==================================================================
145 // NetworkServicesInAdminDomain
146 // ==================================================================
147 [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_HostedDependency" },
148 a.dunfey 1.1 Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
149 "This association establishes the Dependency relationships that "
150 "exist between an administrative domain and the Network "
151 "Services that it hosts. It is deprecated since AdminDomains "
152 "can contain any ManagedSystemElements. There is no special "
153 "relationship needed for NetworkServices. In addition, the Min "
154 "(1) cardinality on AdminDomain is not valid - since it may not "
155 "be possible to define every NetworkService in the context of "
156 "one or more Domains.")]
157 class CIM_NetworkServicesInAdminDomain : CIM_HostedDependency {
158
159 [Deprecated { "CIM_Dependency.Antecedent" },
160 Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
161 "The AdminDomain that hosts and administers the various "
162 "network services.")]
163 CIM_AdminDomain REF Antecedent;
164
165 [Deprecated { "CIM_Dependency.Dependent" },
166 Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
167 "The network service that is hosted in the administrative "
168 "domain.")]
169 a.dunfey 1.1 CIM_NetworkService REF Dependent;
170 };
171
172
173 // ==================================================================
174 // LogicalNetworkService
175 // ==================================================================
176 [Association, Deprecated { "No value" }, Version ( "2.7.0" ),
177 Description (
178 "A LogicalNetworkService represents network services that "
179 "either originate and/or terminate in a LogicalNetwork. This "
180 "association is deprecated since LogicalNetworks aggregate "
181 "ProtocolEndpoints, not their backing Services.")]
182 class CIM_LogicalNetworkService {
183
184 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Key, Description (
185 "The LogicalNetwork that contains the network service.")]
186 CIM_LogicalNetwork REF Network;
187
188 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Key, Description (
189 "The NetworkService that is running in the LogicalNetwork.")]
190 a.dunfey 1.1 CIM_NetworkService REF NetworkService;
191
192 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
193 "An enumeration that explicitly defines this network service "
194 "as originating, terminating, or residing in this "
195 "LogicalNetwork."),
196 ValueMap { "0", "1", "2", "3" },
197 Values { "Unknown", "Originates In", "Terminates In",
198 "Resides In" }]
199 uint16 ContainmentType;
200 };
201
202
203 // ==================================================================
204 // ForwardingService
205 // ==================================================================
206 [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
207 "This class represents the functions used in forwarding network "
208 "traffic. Its instances act on packets received from one or "
209 "more ProtocolEndpoints or Services, and drop (discard), or "
210 "send those packets to one or more other ProtocolEndpoints or "
211 a.dunfey 1.1 "Services. The explicit Endpoints being forwarded between, are "
212 "described using the ForwardsAmong association (or one of its "
213 "subclasses). Generally, the Endpoints are at the same protocol "
214 "layer and are usually of similar types, or of the same type. "
215 "ForwardingService is different than RouteCalculation Service "
216 "in that it represents the function of forwarding traffic "
217 "independent of calculating routing information. \n"
218 "\n"
219 "Examining the ForwardingService class definition, note that "
220 "its superclass NetworkService is deprecated. Therefore, "
221 "NetworkService's properties need not be implemented in an "
222 "instance of ForwardingService. Unfortunately, NetworkService "
223 "cannot be removed from the object hierarchy without a major "
224 "Schema release. When/if this occurs, the NetworkService "
225 "superclass will be removed, and ForwardingService will "
226 "subclass from CIM_Service directly. Also note that there are a "
227 "large number of additional protocols that are not currently "
228 "modeled. These will be added over time.")]
229 class CIM_ForwardingService : CIM_NetworkService {
230
231 [Description (
232 a.dunfey 1.1 "This defines the type of protocol that is being forwarded."),
233 ValueMap { "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9",
234 "10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19" },
235 Values { "Unknown", "Other", "IPv4", "IPv6", "IPv4/IPv6", "IPX",
236 "AppleTalk", "DECnet", "SNA", "CONP", "CLNP", "VINES", "XNS",
237 "ATM", "Frame Relay", "Ethernet", "TokenRing", "FDDI",
238 "Infiniband", "Fibre Channel" },
239 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_ForwardingService.OtherProtocolType"
240 }]
241 uint16 ProtocolType;
242
243 [Description (
244 "This defines the type of protocol that is being forwarded "
245 "when the value of the ProtocolType attribute is 1 (i.e., "
246 "\"Other\"). This provides for future extensibility."),
247 MaxLen ( 32 ),
248 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_ForwardingService.ProtocolType" }]
249 string OtherProtocolType;
250 };
251
252
253 a.dunfey 1.1 // ==================================================================
254 // ForwardsAmong
255 // ==================================================================
256 [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description (
257 "This association represents the dependency that exists between "
258 "the ProtocolEndpoints that are used to forward data and the "
259 "ForwardingService that is performing the forwarding of data.")]
260 class CIM_ForwardsAmong : CIM_ServiceSAPDependency {
261
262 [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
263 "The ProtocolEndpoints that are used to forward the data.")]
264 CIM_ProtocolEndpoint REF Antecedent;
265
266 [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
267 "The service that is forwarding the data.")]
268 CIM_ForwardingService REF Dependent;
269 };
270
271
272 // ==================================================================
273 // HostedForwardingServices
274 a.dunfey 1.1 // ==================================================================
275 [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService" },
276 Version ( "2.7.1" ), Description (
277 "This is a specialization of CIM_HostedService, which is an "
278 "association between a Service and the System on which the "
279 "functionality resides. The class, HostedForwardingServices, is "
280 "deprecated since it provides no additional semantics over "
281 "HostedService, and unecessarily restricts the Service to a "
282 "single ComputerSystem, when the Service could reside in a "
283 "Network or other higher level System.")]
284 class CIM_HostedForwardingServices : CIM_HostedService {
285
286 [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Antecedent" },
287 Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ),
288 Description (
289 "The hosting router.")]
290 CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;
291
292 [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Dependent" },
293 Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
294 "The Service hosted on the System.")]
295 a.dunfey 1.1 CIM_ForwardingService REF Dependent;
296 };
297
298
299 // ==================================================================
300 // RouteCalculationService
301 // ==================================================================
302 [Abstract, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
303 "This is an abstract base class, derived from Service, that "
304 "represents the route calculation aspects of a system. This "
305 "class also addresses functions performed by the system when it "
306 "exchanges routing information. \n"
307 "\n"
308 "Examining the RouteCalculationService class definition, note "
309 "that its superclass NetworkService is deprecated. Therefore, "
310 "NetworkService's properties need not be implemented in an "
311 "instance of RouteCalculationService. Unfortunately, "
312 "NetworkService cannot be removed from the object hierarchy "
313 "without a major Schema release. When/if this occurs, the "
314 "NetworkService superclass will be removed, and "
315 "RouteCalculationService will subclass from CIM_Service "
316 a.dunfey 1.1 "directly. Also note that there are a large number of "
317 "additional routing protocols that are not currently modeled. "
318 "These will be added over time.")]
319 class CIM_RouteCalculationService : CIM_NetworkService {
320
321 [Description (
322 "The RouterID uniquely identifies the router that is "
323 "performing the route calculation. It is the highest IP "
324 "address on the router (or the highest loopback interface, "
325 "if there is one).")]
326 string RouterID;
327
328 [Description (
329 "This is an enumerated value that defines the routing "
330 "algorithm used in this route calculation."),
331 ValueMap { "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8" },
332 Values { "Unknown", "RIPv1", "RIPv2", "OSPFv1", "OSPFv2",
333 "BGPv1", "BGPv2", "BGPv3", "BGPv4" }]
334 uint16 AlgorithmType;
335 };
336
337 a.dunfey 1.1
338 // ==================================================================
339 // CalculatesAmong
340 // ==================================================================
341 [Association, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
342 "This is a specialization of the ServiceSAPDependency "
343 "association, indicating that the referenced ProtocolEndpoint "
344 "is utilized by the RouteCalculationService to provide its "
345 "functionality.")]
346 class CIM_CalculatesAmong : CIM_ServiceSAPDependency {
347
348 [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
349 "The required ProtocolEndpoint.")]
350 CIM_ProtocolEndpoint REF Antecedent;
351
352 [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
353 "The RouteCalculationService, which is dependent on the "
354 "underlying ProtocolEndpoint.")]
355 CIM_RouteCalculationService REF Dependent;
356
357 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
358 a.dunfey 1.1 "TRUE indicates that this ProtocolEndpoint represents a "
359 "static route, and FALSE means that it represents a "
360 "dynamically-learned route. This property is deprecated "
361 "since a Service may use an Endpoint to output several "
362 "routes, some static and others dynamic.")]
363 boolean IsStatic;
364 };
365
366
367 // ==================================================================
368 // HostedRoutingServices
369 // ==================================================================
370 [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService" },
371 Version ( "2.7.1" ), Description (
372 "This is a specialization of CIM_HostedService, which is an "
373 "association between a Service and the System on which the "
374 "functionality resides. The class, HostedRoutingServices, is "
375 "deprecated since it provides no additional semantics over "
376 "HostedService, and unecessarily restricts the Service to a "
377 "single ComputerSystem, when the Service could reside in a "
378 "Network or other higher level System.")]
379 a.dunfey 1.1 class CIM_HostedRoutingServices : CIM_HostedService {
380
381 [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Antecedent" },
382 Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ),
383 Description (
384 "The hosting router.")]
385 CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;
386
387 [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Dependent" },
388 Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
389 "The Service hosted on the System.")]
390 CIM_RouteCalculationService REF Dependent;
391 };
392
393
394 // ====================================================================
395 // RoutingProtocolDomain
396 // ====================================================================
397 [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
398 "A Routing Protocol Domain is a collection of routers which "
399 "coordinate their routing knowledge using a single [instance of "
400 a.dunfey 1.1 "a] routing protocol. This class represents the "
401 "area/layer/level/zone like property of a routing protocol, "
402 "such as an OSPF (area), IS-IS (layer) or PNNI (level). It does "
403 "not represent the entire routing domain in every case. For "
404 "example for OSPF, it represents an Area, but in the case of "
405 "RIP, it represents the whole RIP domain. Any common attributes "
406 "of these routing domains can be placed in this class in future "
407 "versions of CIM.")]
408 class CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain : CIM_AdminDomain {
409 };
410
411
412 // ====================================================================
413 // RoutingProtocolDomainInAS
414 // ====================================================================
415 [Association, Aggregation, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
416 "This assocation connects an AutonomousSystem to the routing "
417 "domains that it contains.")]
418 class CIM_RoutingProtocolDomainInAS : CIM_ContainedDomain {
419
420 [Aggregate, Override ( "GroupComponent" ), Max ( 1 ),
421 a.dunfey 1.1 Description (
422 "The autonomous system.")]
423 CIM_AutonomousSystem REF GroupComponent;
424
425 [Override ( "PartComponent" ), Description (
426 "The routing domain.")]
427 CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain REF PartComponent;
428 };
429
430
431 // ==================================================================
432 // RoutingPolicy
433 // ==================================================================
434 [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
435 "This class is used to implement routing policies. It "
436 "aggregates a set of FilterLists, along with other appropriate "
437 "constructs, into a unit. One of the most important uses of "
438 "this class is to change the routing policy by changing values "
439 "of various attributes in a consistent manner. \n"
440 "\n"
441 "A RoutingPolicy is weak to the network device (i.e., the "
442 a.dunfey 1.1 "ComputerSystem) that contains it. Hence, the ComputerSystem "
443 "keys are propagated to this class. \n"
444 "\n"
445 "Note that this class was defined before the Policy Model and "
446 "hence is not positioned in that hierarchy. The class will be "
447 "repositioned in a later release of the Network Model.")]
448 class CIM_RoutingPolicy : CIM_LogicalElement {
449
450 [Key, Propagated ( "CIM_ComputerSystem.CreationClassName" ),
451 Description (
452 "The scoping ComputerSystem's CreationClassName."),
453 MaxLen ( 256 )]
454 string SystemCreationClassName;
455
456 [Key, Propagated ( "CIM_ComputerSystem.Name" ), Description (
457 "The scoping ComputerSystem's Name."),
458 MaxLen ( 256 )]
459 string SystemName;
460
461 [Key, Description (
462 "CreationClassName indicates the name of the class or the "
463 a.dunfey 1.1 "subclass used in the creation of an instance. When used "
464 "with the other key properties of this class, this property "
465 "allows all instances of this class and its subclasses to be "
466 "uniquely identified."),
467 MaxLen ( 256 )]
468 string CreationClassName;
469
470 [Key, Override ( "Name" ), Description (
471 "This is the name of the Routing Policy."),
472 MaxLen ( 256 )]
473 string Name;
474
475 [Description (
476 "This defines the type of action that will be performed if "
477 "the match conditions of the policy are met. The match "
478 "conditions are defined by the associated ListsIn "
479 "RoutingPolicy. There are essentially three choices: forward "
480 "the traffic unmodified, forward the traffic but modify "
481 "either the attributes describing the route and/or other "
482 "attributes that define how to condition the traffic (e.g., "
483 "its ToS byte settings), or prevent the traffic from being "
484 a.dunfey 1.1 "forwarded."),
485 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9" },
486 Values { "Accept As Is",
487 "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes",
488 "Accept and Remark Packet",
489 "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes and Remark",
490 "Accept With Other Action",
491 "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes and Other Action",
492 "Accept with Remark and Other Action",
493 "Accept with Protocol Attribute Changes, Remark and Other "
494 "Action", "Deny" }]
495 uint16 Action;
496
497 [Description (
498 "This controls whether protocol-specific attributes replace, "
499 "get prepended, or get appended to their existing values."),
500 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3" },
501 Values { "Replace", "Prepend", "Append" },
502 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.BGPAction" }]
503 uint16 AttributeAction;
504
505 a.dunfey 1.1 [Description (
506 "This defines one or more BGP-specific attributes that "
507 "should be used to modify this routing update."),
508 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10" },
509 Values { "Origin", "AS_Path", "NEXT_HOP", "Multi_Exit_Disc",
510 "Local_Pref", "Atomic_Aggregate", "Aggregator", "Community",
511 "Originator_ID", "Cluster_List" },
512 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.BGPValue" }]
513 uint16 BGPAction;
514
515 [Description (
516 "The value for the corresponding BGPAction."),
517 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.BGPAction" }]
518 string BGPValue;
519
520 [Description (
521 "This defines a remarking action for this traffic."),
522 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7" },
523 Values { "Change DSCP", "Change ToS", "Change 802.1Q Value",
524 "Change CIR", "Change CBR", "Change ABR", "Change VBR" },
525 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.RemarkValue" }]
526 a.dunfey 1.1 uint16 RemarkAction;
527
528 [Description (
529 "The value for the corresponding RemarkAction."),
530 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.RemarkAction" }]
531 string RemarkValue;
532
533 [Description (
534 "This defines another action to be taken for this traffic."),
535 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7" },
536 Values { "Other", "Input Flow Policing", "Output Flow Policing",
537 "Input Aggregate Policing", "Output Aggregate Policing",
538 "Police By Marking Down", "Police By Dropping Down" },
539 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningValue",
540 "CIM_RoutingPolicy.OtherConditioningAction" }]
541 uint16 ConditioningAction;
542
543 [Description (
544 "If the value of the ConditioningAction property of this "
545 "class is 1, this contains an application-specific type of "
546 "conditioning that is to be performed. Otherwise, if the "
547 a.dunfey 1.1 "ConditioningAction property is any other value, the value "
548 "of this property should be NULL."),
549 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningAction" }]
550 string OtherConditioningAction;
551
552 [Description (
553 "The value for the corresponding ConditioningAction, if "
554 "appropriate."),
555 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningAction" }]
556 string ConditioningValue;
557 };
558
559
560 // ==================================================================
561 // HostedRoutingPolicy
562 // ==================================================================
563 [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description (
564 "A RoutingPolicy is weak to the network device (i.e., the "
565 "ComputerSystem) that contains it. This association formalizes "
566 "that relationship.")]
567 class CIM_HostedRoutingPolicy : CIM_HostedDependency {
568 a.dunfey 1.1
569 [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ), Description (
570 "The network device/computer system that scopes the "
571 "RoutingPolicy.")]
572 CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;
573
574 [Override ( "Dependent" ), Weak, Description (
575 "The routing policy defined in the context of the network "
576 "device.")]
577 CIM_RoutingPolicy REF Dependent;
578 };
579
580
581 // ==================================================================
582 // ListsInRoutingPolicy
583 // ==================================================================
584 [Association, Aggregation, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description (
585 "This is a specialization of the CIM_Component aggregation "
586 "which is used to define a set of FilterLists that are "
587 "aggregated by a particular RoutingPolicy.")]
588 class CIM_ListsInRoutingPolicy : CIM_Component {
589 a.dunfey 1.1
590 [Aggregate, Override ( "GroupComponent" ), Description (
591 "The RoutingPolicy, which aggregates the set of FilterLists.")]
592 CIM_RoutingPolicy REF GroupComponent;
593
594 [Override ( "PartComponent" ), Description (
595 "A FilterList, which is part-of the RoutingPolicy.")]
596 CIM_FilterList REF PartComponent;
597
598 [Description (
599 "The position of the FilterList relative to all other "
600 "entries in the RoutingPolicy.")]
601 uint16 ListSequence;
602 };
603
604
605 // ===================================================================
606 // end of file
607 // ===================================================================
|
Return to
Network_RoutingForwarding.mof
CVS log
Up to [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIMPrelim291