Return to Network27_Systems.mof CVS log

Up to [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIMPrelim271

PEP#: 215
TITLE: Remove old schemas

DESCRIPTION:

Removing old, unneeded schema files from the repository:

CIM 2.7
CIM 2.7.1 Preliminary
CIM 2.8 Preliminary
CIM 2.9 Preliminary

// ===================================================================
// Title:       Network Systems 2.7
// Filename:    Network27_Systems.mof
// Version:     2.7.0
// Status:      Preliminary
// Date:        07/22/2002
// ===================================================================
// Copyright 1998-2002 Distributed Management Task Force, Inc. (DMTF).
// All rights reserved.  
// DMTF is a not-for-profit association of industry members dedicated 
// to promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability. 
// DMTF specifications and documents may be reproduced for uses
// consistent with this purpose by members and non-members, 
// provided that correct attribution is given. 
// As DMTF specifications may be revised from time to time, 
// the particular version and release date should always be noted.
//
// Implementation of certain elements of this standard or proposed 
// standard may be subject to third party patent rights, including 
// provisional patent rights (herein "patent rights"). DMTF makes 
// no representations to users of the standard as to the existence 
// of such rights, and is not responsible to recognize, disclose, or
// identify any or all such third party patent right, owners or 
// claimants, nor for any incomplete or inaccurate identification or 
// disclosure of such rights, owners or claimants. DMTF shall have no 
// liability to any party, in any manner or circumstance, under any 
// legal theory whatsoever, for failure to recognize, disclose, or 
// identify any such third party patent rights, or for such party's
// reliance on the standard or incorporation thereof in its product, 
// protocols or testing procedures. DMTF shall have no liability to 
// any party implementing such standard, whether such implementation 
// is foreseeable or not, nor to any patent owner or claimant, and shall 
// have no liability or responsibility for costs or losses incurred if 
// a standard is withdrawn or modified after publication, and shall be
// indemnified and held harmless by any party implementing the 
// standard from any and all claims of infringement by a patent owner 
// for such implementations.
//
// For information about patents held by third-parties which have 
// notified the DMTF that, in their opinion, such patent may relate to 
// or impact implementations of DMTF standards, visit 
// http://www.dmtf.org/about/policies/disclosures.php.
// ===================================================================
// Description: The Network Model extends the management concepts to
//              represent protocol interfaces and network/protocol 
//              services.  This file defines network "systems" such
//              as ITU's M.3100 Network and autonomous systems.
//
//              The object classes below are listed in an order that
//              avoids forward references. Required objects, defined 
//              by other working groups, are omitted.
// ==================================================================
// Change Log for v2.7
// CR696 - Add M.3100 concepts of Network and Pipe
// CR792 - Add the Composition qualifer to RoutersInAS
// ===================================================================
 
#pragma Locale ("en_US")


// ==================================================================
// Network
// ==================================================================
   [Experimental, Version ("2.7.0"), Description (
      "Network is a subclass of AdminDomain that groups "
      "interconnected networking and computing objects capable of "
      "exchanging information. Instances of CIM_Network can "
      "represent an enterprise's global network or specific "
      "connectivity domains within the global network. These "
      "concepts are similar to those defined for the Network object "
      "in ITU's M.3100 specification."),
      MappingStrings {"Recommendation.ITU|M3100.Network"} ]
class CIM_Network : CIM_AdminDomain {
};


// ==================================================================
// AutonomousSystem
// ==================================================================
   [Version ("2.6.0"), Description (
      "An Autonomous System (AS) is a fundamental concept in "
      "networking. An AS provides a structured view of routing by "
      "segregating the system that is using routing (e.g., the "
      "Internet, or an extranet) into a set of separately "
      "administered domains that each have their own independent "
      "routing policies. These domains are called  autonomous "
      "systems. \n"
      "\n"
      "The classic definition of an AS, from RFC1771, is '...a set "
      "of  routers under a single technical administration, using "
      "an interior gateway protocol and common metrics to route "
      "packets within the AS, and using an exterior gateway "
      "protocol to route packets to other ASs'. The RFC continues: "
      "'Since this classic definition was developed, it has become "
      "common for a single AS to use several interior gateway "
      "protocols and sometimes several sets of metrics "
      "within an AS.  The use of the term Autonomous System here "
      "stresses the fact that, even when multiple IGPs and metrics "
      "are used, the administration of an AS appears to other ASs "
      "to have a single coherent interior routing plan and "
      "presents a consistent picture of what destinations are "
      "reachable through it.'") ]
class CIM_AutonomousSystem : CIM_AdminDomain {

        [Description (
         "An ASNumber is an integer between 1 and 65535, with the "
         "range 64512 through 65535 reserved for private use. Every "
         "AS has a unique AS number, which is assigned to it by an "
         "Internet Registry or a provider. IANA assigns and "
         "administers AS numbers.") ]
    uint16 ASNumber;

        [Description (
         "IsSingleHomed is a boolean that, when its value is TRUE, "
         "indicates that this AS reaches networks outside of its "
         "domain through a single exit point.") ]
    boolean IsSingleHomed;

        [Description (
         "IsTransit is a boolean that, when its value is TRUE, "
         "indicates that this AS will advertise routes that it "
         "learns from other ASs. A non-transit AS will only "
         "advertise its own routes.") ]
    boolean IsTransit;

        [Description (
         "RequireIGPSync is a boolean that, when its value is TRUE, "
         "indicates that this AS must obey the following rule: a "
         "router should not advertise destinations learned from "
         "internal neighbors to external destinations unless "
         "those destinations are also known via some internal gateway "
         "protocol. Otherwise, a router may receive traffic that "
         "cannot yet be routed. However, since this is a costly "
         "choice, it is common practice to allow this rule to be "
         "broken under certain carefully controlled circumstances.") ]
    boolean RequireIGPSync;

        [Description (
         "RoutingUpdateSource defines how routing information is to "
         "be injected. Statically injected routes are maintained "
         "by the routing table and are independent of the "
         "status of the networks to which they refer. This is done "
         "simply by defining static routes in the routing table. "
         "Dynamically injected routes are of two types. "
         "Dynamic routes refer to distributing all of the IGP routes. "
         "Semi-dynamic routes define a set of specific IGP "
         "routes that will be injected."),
         ValueMap {"0", "1", "2", "3"},
         Values {"Unknown", "Static", "Dynamic", "Semi-Dynamic"} ]
    uint16 RoutingUpdateSource;
 
        [Description (
         "Route aggregation refers to summarizing ranges of routes "
         "into one or more aggregate routes. This is done to minimize "
         "the number of routes in the global routing table. A "
         "potential drawback is that specific path information (e.g., "
         "the Path attribute value) is lost, which may lead to "
         "potential routing loops. There are a variety of ways to "
         "ensure that this does not happen. Note that BGP4 "
         "is required to do this. \n"
         "\n"
         "There are many ways to form aggregate routes. The following "
         "are the most popular: 'Aggregate only', where only the "
         "aggregate is advertised, and all of its more specific "
         "routes are suppressed; 'Aggregate Plus Specific Routes', "
         "where both the aggregate as well as its more specific "
         "routes are advertised (e.g., send the aggregate to the NAP, "
         "but send the more specific routes to providers); "
         "'Aggregate Based on a Subset of Specific Routes', where the "
         "aggregate route is formed by looking at certain more "
         "specific routes and forming an aggregate on them, "
         "suppressing all others."),
         ValueMap {"0", "1", "2", "3", "4"},
         Values {"Unknown", "None", "Aggregate Only ",
            "Aggregate And All Specific Routes ",
            "Aggregate Based on Subset of Specific Routes"} ]
    uint16 AggregationType;
};

// ==================================================================
// RoutersInAS
// ==================================================================
   [Association, Aggregation, Composition, Version ("2.7.0"), 
      Description (
      "This aggregation establishes 'whole-part' relationships "
      "between an AutonomousSystem and the routers that it "
      "contains. In addition, the routers in the AS share common "
      "configuration information, and are commonly administered.") ]
class CIM_RoutersInAS : CIM_SystemComponent {

        [Override ("GroupComponent"), Aggregate, Max (1), 
         Description (
         "The AutonomousSystem that aggregates the routers belonging "
         "to it and administers them.") ]
    CIM_AutonomousSystem REF GroupComponent;

        [Override ("PartComponent"), Description (
         "The Routers that are contained in the AS.") ] 
    CIM_ComputerSystem REF PartComponent;

        [Description (
         "This is an array of strings that contain the BGP attributes "
         "supported by this router.") ]
    string BGPSupportedAttributes[];

        [Description (
         "TRUE means that the community value of this router is added "
         "to the existing community value, and FALSE means that the "
         "community value of this router replaces the existing "
         "community value.") ]
    boolean AddCommunityValue;

        [Description (
         "This is an enumeration that defines the function, from the "
         "point of view of BGP, of this router."),
         ValueMap {"0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7"},
         Values {"Unknown", "Other", "Conventional BGP Speaker",
            "Route Reflector", "Router Reflector Client",
            "Route Reflector Non-Client", "Peer Group Member",
            "Confederation Member"},
         ModelCorrespondence {
            "CIM_BGPService.OtherRoleDescription"} ]
    uint16 Role;

        [MaxLen(64), Description (
         "A string describing the type of function that this router "
         "has in its AS when the value of the Role property of this "
         "class is set to 1 (i.e., \"Other\"). The format of the string "
         "inserted in this property should be similar in format to "
         "the values defined for the Role property. This property "
         "should be set to NULL when the Role property is any value "
         "other than 1."),
         ModelCorrespondence {"CIM_BGPService.Role"} ]
   string OtherRoleDescription;
};


// ===================================================================
// end of file
// ===================================================================