1 karl 1.1 // ===================================================================
2 // Title: Network Routing and Forwarding Services 2.7
3 // Filename: Network27_RoutingForwarding.mof
4 // Version: 2.7.0
5 // Status: Preliminary
6 // Date: 08/04/2002
7 // ===================================================================
8 // Copyright 1998-2002 Distributed Management Task Force, Inc. (DMTF).
9 // All rights reserved.
10 // DMTF is a not-for-profit association of industry members dedicated
11 // to promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability.
12 // DMTF specifications and documents may be reproduced for uses
13 // consistent with this purpose by members and non-members,
14 // provided that correct attribution is given.
15 // As DMTF specifications may be revised from time to time,
16 // the particular version and release date should always be noted.
17 //
18 // Implementation of certain elements of this standard or proposed
19 // standard may be subject to third party patent rights, including
20 // provisional patent rights (herein "patent rights"). DMTF makes
21 // no representations to users of the standard as to the existence
22 karl 1.1 // of such rights, and is not responsible to recognize, disclose, or
23 // identify any or all such third party patent right, owners or
24 // claimants, nor for any incomplete or inaccurate identification or
25 // disclosure of such rights, owners or claimants. DMTF shall have no
26 // liability to any party, in any manner or circumstance, under any
27 // legal theory whatsoever, for failure to recognize, disclose, or
28 // identify any such third party patent rights, or for such party's
29 // reliance on the standard or incorporation thereof in its product,
30 // protocols or testing procedures. DMTF shall have no liability to
31 // any party implementing such standard, whether such implementation
32 // is foreseeable or not, nor to any patent owner or claimant, and shall
33 // have no liability or responsibility for costs or losses incurred if
34 // a standard is withdrawn or modified after publication, and shall be
35 // indemnified and held harmless by any party implementing the
36 // standard from any and all claims of infringement by a patent owner
37 // for such implementations.
38 //
39 // For information about patents held by third-parties which have
40 // notified the DMTF that, in their opinion, such patent may relate to
41 // or impact implementations of DMTF standards, visit
42 // http://www.dmtf.org/about/policies/disclosures.php.
43 karl 1.1 // ===================================================================
44 // Description: The Network Model extends the management concepts to
45 // represent protocol interfaces and network/protocol
46 // services. This file defines network routing and
47 // forwarding services.
48 //
49 // The object classes below are listed in an order that
50 // avoids forward references. Required objects, defined
51 // by other working groups, are omitted.
52 // ==================================================================
53 // Change Log for v2.7
54 // CR662 - Deprecate NetworkService and NetworkServicesInAdminDomain
55 // - Modify Descriptions of subclasses of NetworkService
56 // to clarify current status (RouteCalculationService and
57 // ForwardingService)
58 // - Deprecate HostingRoutingServices, HostedForwardingService
59 // and LogicalNetworkService
60 // CR788 - Add the classes, RoutingProtocolDomain and RoutingProtocol
61 // DomainInAS, from the OSPF submission
62 // CR866 - Cleanup of the RoutingPolicy class
63 // ===================================================================
64 karl 1.1
65 #pragma Locale ("en_US")
66
67
68 // ==================================================================
69 // NetworkService
70 // ==================================================================
71 [Abstract, Version ("2.7.0"), Deprecated {"CIM_Service"},
72 Description (
73 "This is an abstract base class, derived from the Service "
74 "class. It is deprecated in Version 2.7 with the "
75 "recommendation that the Service class be subclassed "
76 "instead. Distinguishing between services that modify "
77 "traffic versus supporting basic communication has not "
78 "proved useful.") ]
79 class CIM_NetworkService : CIM_Service {
80
81 [Deprecated {"No value"}, Description (
82 "This is a free-form array of strings that provide "
83 "descriptive words and phrases that can be used in queries. "
84 "To-date, this property has not been implemented, since it "
85 karl 1.1 "is not standardized. Also, if this was a necessary query "
86 "construct, then it would be required higher in the "
87 "inheritance hierarchy. The latter has not proven "
88 "necessary. Therefore, the property is deprecated.") ]
89 string Keywords [ ];
90
91 [Deprecated {"CIM_ServiceAccessPoint"}, Description (
92 "This is a URL that provides the protocol, network "
93 "location, and other service-specific information required "
94 "in order to access the service. It is deprecated with the "
95 "recommendation that ServiceAccessPoint be subclassed and "
96 "instantiated instead.") ]
97 string ServiceURL;
98
99 [Deprecated {"No value"}, Description (
100 "This is a free-form array of strings that specify any "
101 "specific pre-conditions that must be met in order for this "
102 "service to start correctly. It was expected that subclasses "
103 "would refine the inherited StartService() method "
104 "to suit their specific needs. To-date, this refinement "
105 "has not been necessary. Also, the property is not very "
106 karl 1.1 "useful, since it is not standardized. If this was a "
107 "necessary construct, then it would be required higher in the "
108 "inheritance hierarchy (on Service). The latter has not "
109 "proven true. Therefore, the property is deprecated.") ]
110 string StartupConditions [ ];
111
112 [Deprecated {"No value"}, Description (
113 "This is a free-form array of strings that specify any "
114 "specific parameters that must be supplied to the "
115 "StartService() method in order for this service to start "
116 "correctly. It was expected that subclasses would refine the "
117 "inherited StartService() methods to suit their specific "
118 "needs. To-date, this refinement has not been necessary. "
119 "If indeed the method were refined, then its parameters "
120 "would more formally convey this information. Therefore, "
121 "the property is deprecated.") ]
122 string StartupParameters [ ];
123 };
124
125
126 // ==================================================================
127 karl 1.1 // NetworkServicesInAdminDomain
128 // ==================================================================
129 [Association, Version ("2.7.0"), Deprecated {"CIM_Dependency"},
130 Description (
131 "This association establishes the Dependency relationships "
132 "that exist between an administrative domain and the Network"
133 "Services that it hosts. It is deprecated since "
134 "AdminDomains can contain any ManagedSystemElements. There "
135 "is no special relationship needed for NetworkServices. In "
136 "addition, the Min (1) cardinality on AdminDomain is "
137 "not valid - since it may not be possible to define every "
138 "NetworkService in the context of one or more Domains.") ]
139 class CIM_NetworkServicesInAdminDomain : CIM_Dependency {
140
141 [Override ("Antecedent"),
142 Deprecated {"CIM_Dependency.Antecedent"}, Description (
143 "The AdminDomain that hosts and administers the various "
144 "network services.") ]
145 CIM_AdminDomain REF Antecedent;
146
147 [Override ("Dependent"),
148 karl 1.1 Deprecated {"CIM_Dependency.Dependent"}, Description (
149 "The network service that is hosted in the administrative "
150 "domain.") ]
151 CIM_NetworkService REF Dependent;
152 };
153
154
155 // ==================================================================
156 // LogicalNetworkService
157 // ==================================================================
158 [Association, Version ("2.7.0"), Deprecated {"No value"},
159 Description (
160 "A LogicalNetworkService represents network services that "
161 "either originate and/or terminate in a LogicalNetwork. This "
162 "association is deprecated since LogicalNetworks aggregate "
163 "ProtocolEndpoints, not their backing Services.") ]
164 class CIM_LogicalNetworkService {
165
166 [Key, Deprecated {"No value"}, Description (
167 "The LogicalNetwork that contains the network service.") ]
168 CIM_LogicalNetwork REF Network;
169 karl 1.1
170 [Key, Deprecated {"No value"}, Description (
171 "The NetworkService that is running in the LogicalNetwork. ") ]
172 CIM_NetworkService REF NetworkService;
173
174 [Deprecated {"No value"}, Description (
175 "An enumeration that explicitly defines this network service "
176 "as originating, terminating, or residing in this "
177 "LogicalNetwork. "),
178 ValueMap {"0", "1", "2", "3"},
179 Values {"Unknown", "Originates In", "Terminates In",
180 "Resides In"} ]
181 uint16 ContainmentType;
182 };
183
184
185 // ==================================================================
186 // ForwardingService
187 // ==================================================================
188 [Version ("2.7.0"), Description (
189 "This class represents the functions used in forwarding "
190 karl 1.1 "network traffic. Its instances act on packets received"
191 "from one or more ProtocolEndpoints or Services, and "
192 "drop (discard), or send those packets to one or more "
193 "other ProtocolEndpoints or Services. The explicit "
194 "Endpoints being forwarded between, are described using the "
195 "ForwardsAmong association (or one of its subclasses). "
196 "Generally, the Endpoints are at the same protocol layer "
197 "and are usually of similar types, or of the same type. "
198 "ForwardingService is different than RouteCalculation"
199 "Service in that it represents the function of forwarding "
200 "traffic independent of calculating routing information. \n"
201 "\n"
202 "Examining the ForwardingService class definition, "
203 "note that its superclass NetworkService is deprecated. "
204 "Therefore, NetworkService's properties need not be "
205 "implemented in an instance of ForwardingService. "
206 "Unfortunately, NetworkService cannot be removed from "
207 "the object hierarchy without a major Schema release. "
208 "When/if this occurs, the NetworkService superclass will "
209 "be removed, and ForwardingService will subclass "
210 "from CIM_Service directly. Also note that there are "
211 karl 1.1 "a large number of additional protocols "
212 "that are not currently modeled. These will be added "
213 "over time.") ]
214 class CIM_ForwardingService : CIM_NetworkService {
215
216 [Description (
217 "This defines the type of protocol that is being "
218 "forwarded."),
219 ValueMap {"0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8",
220 "9", "10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16",
221 "17", "18", "19"},
222 Values {"Unknown", "Other", "IPv4", "IPv6", "IPv4/IPv6",
223 "IPX", "AppleTalk", "DECnet", "SNA", "CONP",
224 "CLNP", "VINES", "XNS", "ATM", "Frame Relay",
225 "Ethernet", "TokenRing", "FDDI", "Infiniband",
226 "Fibre Channel"},
227 ModelCorrespondence {
228 "CIM_ForwardingService.OtherProtocolType"} ]
229 uint16 ProtocolType;
230
231 [MaxLen(32), Description (
232 karl 1.1 "This defines the type of protocol that is being forwarded "
233 "when the value of the ProtocolType attribute is 1 (i.e., "
234 "\"Other\"). This provides for future extensibility."),
235 ModelCorrespondence {"CIM_ForwardingService.ProtocolType"} ]
236 string OtherProtocolType;
237 };
238
239
240 // ==================================================================
241 // ForwardsAmong
242 // ==================================================================
243 [Association, Version ("2.6.0"), Description (
244 "This association represents the dependency that exists "
245 "between the ProtocolEndpoints that are used to forward data "
246 "and the ForwardingService that is performing the forwarding "
247 "of data.") ]
248 class CIM_ForwardsAmong : CIM_ServiceSAPDependency {
249
250 [Override ("Antecedent"), Description(
251 "The ProtocolEndpoints that are used to forward the data.") ]
252 CIM_ProtocolEndpoint REF Antecedent;
253 karl 1.1
254 [Override ("Dependent"), Description(
255 "The service that is forwarding the data.") ]
256 CIM_ForwardingService REF Dependent;
257 };
258
259
260 // ==================================================================
261 // HostedForwardingServices
262 // ==================================================================
263 [Association, Version ("2.7.0"),
264 Deprecated {"CIM_HostedService"}, Description (
265 "This is a specialization of CIM_HostedService, which is an"
266 "association between a Service and the System on which the "
267 "functionality resides. The class, HostedForwardingServices, "
268 "is deprecated since it provides no additional semantics "
269 "over HostedService, and unecessarily restricts the "
270 "Service to a single ComputerSystem, when the Service could "
271 "reside in a Network or other higher level System.") ]
272 class CIM_HostedForwardingServices : CIM_HostedService {
273
274 karl 1.1 [Override ("Antecedent"), Min (1), Max (1),
275 Description ("The hosting router.") ]
276 CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;
277
278 [Override ("Dependent"), Description (
279 "The Service hosted on the System.") ]
280 CIM_ForwardingService REF Dependent;
281 };
282
283
284 // ==================================================================
285 // RouteCalculationService
286 // ==================================================================
287 [Abstract, Version ("2.7.0"), Description (
288 "This is an abstract base class, derived from Service, "
289 "that represents the route calculation aspects of "
290 "a system. This class also addresses functions performed "
291 "by the system when it exchanges routing information. \n"
292 "\n"
293 "Examining the RouteCalculationService class definition, "
294 "note that its superclass NetworkService is deprecated. "
295 karl 1.1 "Therefore, NetworkService's properties need not be "
296 "implemented in an instance of RouteCalculationService. "
297 "Unfortunately, NetworkService cannot be removed from "
298 "the object hierarchy without a major Schema release. "
299 "When/if this occurs, the NetworkService superclass will "
300 "be removed, and RouteCalculationService will subclass "
301 "from CIM_Service directly. Also note that there are "
302 "a large number of additional routing protocols "
303 "that are not currently modeled. These will be added "
304 "over time.") ]
305 class CIM_RouteCalculationService : CIM_NetworkService {
306
307 [Description (
308 "The RouterID uniquely identifies the router that is "
309 "performing the route calculation. It is the highest IP "
310 "address on the router (or the highest loopback interface, "
311 "if there is one).") ]
312 string RouterID;
313
314 [Description (
315 "This is an enumerated value that defines the routing "
316 karl 1.1 "algorithm used in this route calculation."),
317 ValueMap {"0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8"},
318 Values {"Unknown", "RIPv1", "RIPv2", "OSPFv1", "OSPFv2",
319 "BGPv1", "BGPv2", "BGPv3", "BGPv4"} ]
320 uint16 AlgorithmType;
321 };
322
323
324 // ==================================================================
325 // CalculatesAmong
326 // ==================================================================
327 [Association, Version ("2.6.0"), Description (
328 "This is a specialization of the ServiceSAPDependency "
329 "association, indicating that the referenced "
330 "ProtocolEndpoint is utilized by the "
331 "RouteCalculationService to provide its functionality.") ]
332 class CIM_CalculatesAmong : CIM_ServiceSAPDependency {
333
334 [Override ("Antecedent"),
335 Description ("The required ProtocolEndpoint.") ]
336 CIM_ProtocolEndpoint REF Antecedent;
337 karl 1.1
338 [Override ("Dependent"), Description (
339 "The RouteCalculationService, which is dependent on the "
340 "underlying ProtocolEndpoint.") ]
341 CIM_RouteCalculationService REF Dependent;
342
343 [Deprecated {"No value"}, Description (
344 "TRUE indicates that this ProtocolEndpoint represents a "
345 "static route, and FALSE means that it represents a "
346 "dynamically-learned route. This property is deprecated "
347 "since a Service may use an Endpoint to output several "
348 "routes, some static and others dynamic.") ]
349 boolean IsStatic;
350 };
351
352
353 // ==================================================================
354 // HostedRoutingServices
355 // ==================================================================
356 [Association, Version ("2.7.0"),
357 Deprecated {"CIM_HostedService"}, Description (
358 karl 1.1 "This is a specialization of CIM_HostedService, which is an"
359 "association between a Service and the System on which the "
360 "functionality resides. The class, HostedRoutingServices, "
361 "is deprecated since it provides no additional semantics "
362 "over HostedService, and unecessarily restricts the "
363 "Service to a single ComputerSystem, when the Service could "
364 "reside in a Network or other higher level System.") ]
365 class CIM_HostedRoutingServices : CIM_HostedService {
366
367 [Override ("Antecedent"), Min (1), Max (1),
368 Description ("The hosting router.") ]
369 CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;
370
371 [Override ("Dependent"), Description (
372 "The Service hosted on the System.") ]
373 CIM_RouteCalculationService REF Dependent;
374 };
375
376
377 // ====================================================================
378 // RoutingProtocolDomain
379 karl 1.1 // ====================================================================
380 [Experimental, Version ("2.7.0"), Description (
381 "A Routing Protocol Domain is a collection of routers which "
382 "coordinate their routing knowledge using a single [instance of "
383 "a] routing protocol. This class represents the "
384 "area/layer/level/zone like property of a routing protocol, "
385 "such as an OSPF (area), IS-IS (layer) or PNNI (level). It does not "
386 "represent the entire routing domain in every case. For example "
387 "for OSPF, it represents an Area, but in the case of RIP, it "
388 "represents the whole RIP domain. Any common attributes of these "
389 "routing domains can be placed in this class in future "
390 "versions of CIM.") ]
391 class CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain : CIM_AdminDomain {
392 };
393
394
395 // ====================================================================
396 // RoutingProtocolDomainInAS
397 // ====================================================================
398 [Association, Aggregation, Experimental, Version ("2.7.0"),
399 Description (
400 karl 1.1 "This assocation connects an AutonomousSystem to the routing "
401 "domains that it contains.") ]
402 class CIM_RoutingProtocolDomainInAS : CIM_ContainedDomain {
403
404 [Override ("GroupComponent"), Aggregate, Max (1),
405 Description ("The autonomous system.") ]
406 CIM_AutonomousSystem REF GroupComponent;
407
408 [Override ("PartComponent"),
409 Description ("The routing domain.") ]
410 CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain REF PartComponent;
411 };
412
413
414 // ==================================================================
415 // RoutingPolicy
416 // ==================================================================
417 [Version ("2.7.0"), Description (
418 "This class is used to implement routing policies. It "
419 "aggregates a set of FilterLists, along with other "
420 "appropriate constructs, into a unit. One of the most "
421 karl 1.1 "important uses of this class is to change the routing "
422 "policy by changing values of various attributes in a "
423 "consistent manner. \n"
424 "\n"
425 "A RoutingPolicy is weak to the network device (i.e., the "
426 "ComputerSystem) that contains it. Hence, the ComputerSystem "
427 "keys are propagated to this class. \n"
428 "\n"
429 "Note that this class was defined before the Policy Model and "
430 "hence is not positioned in that hierarchy. The class will be "
431 "repositioned in a later release of the Network Model.") ]
432 class CIM_RoutingPolicy : CIM_LogicalElement {
433
434 [Propagated ("CIM_ComputerSystem.CreationClassName"), Key,
435 MaxLen (256), Description (
436 "The scoping ComputerSystem's CreationClassName.") ]
437 string SystemCreationClassName;
438
439 [Propagated ("CIM_ComputerSystem.Name"), Key, MaxLen (256),
440 Description ("The scoping ComputerSystem's Name.") ]
441 string SystemName;
442 karl 1.1
443 [Key, MaxLen(256), Description (
444 "CreationClassName indicates the name of the class or the "
445 "subclass used in the creation of an instance. When used "
446 "with the other key properties of this class, this property "
447 "allows all instances of this class and its subclasses to "
448 "be uniquely identified.") ]
449 string CreationClassName;
450
451 [Override ("Name"), Key, MaxLen(256), Description (
452 "This is the name of the Routing Policy.") ]
453 string Name;
454
455 [Description (
456 "This defines the type of action that will be performed "
457 "if the match conditions of the policy are met. The "
458 "match conditions are defined by the associated ListsIn"
459 "RoutingPolicy. There are essentially three choices: "
460 "forward the traffic unmodified, forward the traffic "
461 "but modify either the attributes describing the "
462 "route and/or other attributes that define how to "
463 karl 1.1 "condition the traffic (e.g., its ToS byte settings), "
464 "or prevent the traffic from being forwarded."),
465 ValueMap {"1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9"},
466 Values {"Accept As Is",
467 "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes",
468 "Accept and Remark Packet",
469 "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes and Remark",
470 "Accept With Other Action",
471 "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes and Other Action",
472 "Accept with Remark and Other Action",
473 "Accept with Protocol Attribute Changes, Remark "
474 "and Other Action", "Deny"} ]
475 uint16 Action;
476
477 [Description (
478 "This controls whether protocol-specific attributes "
479 "replace, get prepended, or get appended to their "
480 "existing values."),
481 ValueMap {"1", "2", "3"},
482 Values {"Replace", "Prepend", "Append"},
483 ModelCorrespondence {
484 karl 1.1 "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ProtocolAttributeAction"} ]
485 uint16 AttributeAction;
486
487 [Deprecated {"CIM_BGPSpecificPolicyAttributes.BGPActions"},
488 Description (
489 "This defines one or more BGP-specific attributes "
490 "that should be used to modify this routing update. "
491 "The property is deprecated in lieu of specific "
492 "attribute Settings classes - for example, BGPSpecific"
493 "PolicyAttributes - that are associated using the "
494 "ElementSettingData relationship."),
495 ValueMap {"1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9",
496 "10"},
497 Values {"Origin", "AS_Path", "NEXT_HOP", "Multi_Exit_Disc",
498 "Local_Pref", "Atomic_Aggregate", "Aggregator", "Community",
499 "Originator_ID", "Cluster_List"} ]
500 uint16 BGPAction;
501
502 [Deprecated {"CIM_BGPSpecificPolicyAttributes"},
503 Description (
504 "The value for the corresponding BGPAction. The property "
505 karl 1.1 "is deprecated in lieu of specific 'protocol' SettingData "
506 "classes - for example, BGPSpecificPolicyAttribute - that "
507 "are associated using the ElementSettingData relationship.") ]
508 string BGPValue;
509
510 [Description (
511 "This defines a remarking action for this traffic."),
512 ValueMap {"1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7"},
513 Values {"Change DSCP", "Change ToS", "Change 802.1Q Value",
514 "Change CIR", "Change CBR", "Change ABR", "Change VBR"},
515 ModelCorrespondence {"CIM_RoutingPolicy.RemarkValue"} ]
516 uint16 RemarkAction;
517
518 [Description (
519 "The value for the corresponding RemarkAction."),
520 ModelCorrespondence {"CIM_RoutingPolicy.RemarkAction"} ]
521 string RemarkValue;
522
523 [Description (
524 "This defines another action to be taken for this traffic."),
525 ValueMap {"1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7"},
526 karl 1.1 Values {"Other", "Input Flow Policing",
527 "Output Flow Policing", "Input Aggregate Policing",
528 "Output Aggregate Policing",
529 "Police By Marking Down", "Police By Dropping Down"},
530 ModelCorrespondence {"CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningValue"} ]
531 uint16 ConditioningAction;
532
533 [Description (
534 "If the value of the ConditioningAction property of this "
535 "class is 1, this contains an application-specific type of "
536 "conditioning that is to be performed. Otherwise, if the "
537 "ConditioningAction property is any other value, the value "
538 "of this property should be NULL."),
539 ModelCorrespondence {
540 "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningAction"} ]
541 string OtherConditioningAction;
542
543 [Description (
544 "The value for the corresponding ConditioningAction, if "
545 "appropriate."),
546 ModelCorrespondence {"CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningAction"} ]
547 karl 1.1 string ConditioningValue;
548 };
549
550
551 // ==================================================================
552 // HostedRoutingPolicy
553 // ==================================================================
554 [Association, Version ("2.6.0"), Description (
555 "A RoutingPolicy is weak to the network device (i.e., the "
556 "ComputerSystem) that contains it. This association "
557 "formalizes that relationship.") ]
558 class CIM_HostedRoutingPolicy : CIM_Dependency {
559
560 [Override ("Antecedent"), Min (1), Max (1), Description (
561 "The network device/computer system that scopes the "
562 "RoutingPolicy.") ]
563 CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;
564
565 [Override ("Dependent"), Weak, Description (
566 "The routing policy defined in the context of the "
567 "network device.") ]
568 karl 1.1 CIM_RoutingPolicy REF Dependent;
569 };
570
571
572 // ==================================================================
573 // ListsInRoutingPolicy
574 // ==================================================================
575 [Association, Aggregation, Version ("2.6.0"),
576 Description (
577 "This is a specialization of the CIM_Component aggregation "
578 "which is used to define a set of FilterLists that are "
579 "aggregated by a particular RoutingPolicy.") ]
580 class CIM_ListsInRoutingPolicy : CIM_Component {
581
582 [Override ("GroupComponent"), Aggregate, Description (
583 "The RoutingPolicy, which aggregates the set "
584 "of FilterLists.") ]
585 CIM_RoutingPolicy REF GroupComponent;
586
587 [Override ("PartComponent"), Description (
588 "A FilterList, which is part-of the RoutingPolicy.") ]
589 karl 1.1 CIM_FilterList REF PartComponent;
590
591 [Description ("The position of the FilterList relative "
592 "to all other entries in the RoutingPolicy.") ]
593 uint16 ListSequence;
594 };
595
596
597 // ===================================================================
598 // end of file
599 // ===================================================================
|
Return to
Network27_RoutingForwarding.mof
CVS log
Up to [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIMPrelim271