Return to User_Account.mof CVS log | Up to [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIM29 |
File: [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIM29 / User_Account.mof
(download)
Revision: 1.1, Thu Feb 17 00:09:56 2005 UTC (19 years, 4 months ago) by a.dunfey Branch: MAIN CVS Tags: preBug9676, postBug9676, TASK_PEP328_SOLARIS_NEVADA_PORT, TASK_PEP317_1JUNE_2013, TASK_PEP233_EmbeddedInstSupport-merge_out_trunk, TASK_BUG_5314_IPC_REFACTORING_ROOT, TASK_BUG_5314_IPC_REFACTORING_BRANCH, TASK_BUG_5314_IPC_REFACTORING-V1, TASK_BUG_5191_QUEUE_CONSOLIDATION_ROOT, TASK_BUG_5191_QUEUE_CONSOLIDATION_BRANCH, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-root, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-branch, TASK-TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-branch-New-root, TASK-TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-branch-New-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-branch-New-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-branch-New-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-branch-New-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-branch-New-branch, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-root, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-branch, TASK-PEP348_SCMO-root, TASK-PEP348_SCMO-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP348_SCMO-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP348_SCMO-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP348_SCMO-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP348_SCMO-branch, TASK-PEP328_SOLARIS_NEVADA_PORT_v2-root, TASK-PEP328_SOLARIS_NEVADA_PORT_v2-branch, TASK-PEP328_SOLARIS_NEVADA_PORT-root, TASK-PEP328_SOLARIS_NEVADA_PORT-branch, TASK-PEP328_SOLARIS_IX86_CC_PORT-root, TASK-PEP328_SOLARIS_IX86_CC_PORT-branch-v2, TASK-PEP328_SOLARIS_IX86_CC_PORT-branch, TASK-PEP317_pullop-root, TASK-PEP317_pullop-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP317_pullop-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP317_pullop-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP317_pullop-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP317_pullop-branch, TASK-PEP311_WSMan-root, TASK-PEP311_WSMan-branch, TASK-PEP305_VXWORKS-root, TASK-PEP305_VXWORKS-branch-pre-solaris-port, TASK-PEP305_VXWORKS-branch-post-solaris-port, TASK-PEP305_VXWORKS-branch-beta2, TASK-PEP305_VXWORKS-branch, TASK-PEP305_VXWORKS-2008-10-23, TASK-PEP291_IPV6-root, TASK-PEP291_IPV6-branch, TASK-PEP286_PRIVILEGE_SEPARATION-root, TASK-PEP286_PRIVILEGE_SEPARATION-branch, TASK-PEP274_dacim-root, TASK-PEP274_dacim-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP274_dacim-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP274_dacim-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP274_dacim-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP274_dacim-branch, TASK-PEP268_SSLClientCertificatePropagation-root, TASK-PEP268_SSLClientCertificatePropagation-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP268_SSLClientCertificatePropagation-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP268_SSLClientCertificatePropagation-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP268_SSLClientCertificatePropagation-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP268_SSLClientCertificatePropagation-branch, TASK-PEP267_SLPReregistrationSupport-root, TASK-PEP267_SLPReregistrationSupport-merging_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP267_SLPReregistrationSupport-merging_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP267_SLPReregistrationSupport-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP267_SLPReregistrationSupport-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP267_SLPReregistrationSupport-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP267_SLPReregistrationSupport-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP267_SLPReregistrationSupport-branch, TASK-PEP250_RPMProvider-root, TASK-PEP250_RPMProvider-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP250_RPMProvider-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP250_RPMProvider-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP250_RPMProvider-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP250_RPMProvider-branch, TASK-PEP245_CimErrorInfrastructure-root, TASK-PEP245_CimErrorInfrastructure-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP245_CimErrorInfrastructure-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP245_CimErrorInfrastructure-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP245_CimErrorInfrastructure-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP245_CimErrorInfrastructure-branch, TASK-PEP241_OpenPegasusStressTests-root, TASK-PEP241_OpenPegasusStressTests-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP241_OpenPegasusStressTests-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP241_OpenPegasusStressTests-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP241_OpenPegasusStressTests-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP241_OpenPegasusStressTests-branch, TASK-Bugs5690_3913_RemoteCMPI-root, TASK-Bugs5690_3913_RemoteCMPI-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-Bugs5690_3913_RemoteCMPI-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-Bugs5690_3913_RemoteCMPI-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-Bugs5690_3913_RemoteCMPI-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-Bugs5690_3913_RemoteCMPI-branch, TASK-Bug2102_RCMPIWindows-root, TASK-Bug2102_RCMPIWindows-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-Bug2102_RCMPIWindows-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-Bug2102_RCMPIWindows-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-Bug2102_RCMPIWindows-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-Bug2102_RCMPIWindows-branch, TASK-Bug2102Final-root, TASK-Bug2102Final-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-Bug2102Final-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-Bug2102Final-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-Bug2102Final-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-Bug2102Final-branch, TASK-Bug2021_RemoteCMPIonWindows-root, TASK-Bug2021_RemoteCMPIonWindows-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-Bug2021_RemoteCMPIonWindows-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-Bug2021_RemoteCMPIonWindows-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-Bug2021_RemoteCMPIonWindows-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-Bug2021_RemoteCMPIonWindows-branch, TASK-Bug2021_RCMPIonWindows-root, TASK-Bug2021_RCMPIonWindows-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-Bug2021_RCMPIonWindows-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-Bug2021_RCMPIonWindows-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-Bug2021_RCMPIonWindows-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-Bug2021_RCMPIonWindows-branch, TASK-BUG7240-root, TASK-BUG7240-branch, TASK-BUG7146_SqlRepositoryPrototype-root, TASK-BUG7146_SqlRepositoryPrototype-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-BUG7146_SqlRepositoryPrototype-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-BUG7146_SqlRepositoryPrototype-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-BUG7146_SqlRepositoryPrototype-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-BUG7146_SqlRepositoryPrototype-branch, TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-root, TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-branch-New, TASK-BUG4011_WinLocalConnect-branch, STABLE, RELEASE_2_9_2-RC2, RELEASE_2_9_2-RC1, RELEASE_2_9_2, RELEASE_2_9_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_9_1, RELEASE_2_9_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_9_0-FC, RELEASE_2_9_0, RELEASE_2_9-root, RELEASE_2_9-branch, RELEASE_2_8_2-RC1, RELEASE_2_8_2, RELEASE_2_8_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_8_1, RELEASE_2_8_0_BETA, RELEASE_2_8_0-RC2, RELEASE_2_8_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_8_0-FC, RELEASE_2_8_0, RELEASE_2_8-root, RELEASE_2_8-branch, RELEASE_2_7_3-RC1, RELEASE_2_7_3, RELEASE_2_7_2-RC1, RELEASE_2_7_2, RELEASE_2_7_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_7_1, RELEASE_2_7_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_7_0-BETA, RELEASE_2_7_0, RELEASE_2_7-root, RELEASE_2_7-branch, RELEASE_2_6_3-RC2, RELEASE_2_6_3-RC1, RELEASE_2_6_3, RELEASE_2_6_2-RC1, RELEASE_2_6_2, RELEASE_2_6_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_6_1, RELEASE_2_6_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_6_0-FC, RELEASE_2_6_0, RELEASE_2_6-root, RELEASE_2_6-branch-clean, RELEASE_2_6-branch, RELEASE_2_5_5-RC2, RELEASE_2_5_5-RC1, RELEASE_2_5_5, RELEASE_2_5_4-RC2, RELEASE_2_5_4-RC1, RELEASE_2_5_4, RELEASE_2_5_3-RC1, RELEASE_2_5_3, RELEASE_2_5_2-RC1, RELEASE_2_5_2, RELEASE_2_5_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_5_1, RELEASE_2_5_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_5_0, RELEASE_2_5-root, RELEASE_2_5-branch, RELEASE_2_14_1, RELEASE_2_14_0-RC2, RELEASE_2_14_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_14_0, RELEASE_2_14-root, RELEASE_2_14-branch, RELEASE_2_13_0-RC2, RELEASE_2_13_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_13_0-FC, RELEASE_2_13_0, RELEASE_2_13-root, RELEASE_2_13-branch, RELEASE_2_12_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_12_1, RELEASE_2_12_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_12_0-FC, RELEASE_2_12_0, RELEASE_2_12-root, RELEASE_2_12-branch, RELEASE_2_11_2-RC1, RELEASE_2_11_2, RELEASE_2_11_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_11_1, RELEASE_2_11_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_11_0-FC, RELEASE_2_11_0, RELEASE_2_11-root, RELEASE_2_11-branch, RELEASE_2_10_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_10_1, RELEASE_2_10_0-RC2, RELEASE_2_10_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_10_0, RELEASE_2_10-root, RELEASE_2_10-branch, PREAUG25UPDATE, POSTAUG25UPDATE, PEP286_PRIVILEGE_SEPARATION_ROOT, PEP286_PRIVILEGE_SEPARATION_CODE_FREEZE, PEP286_PRIVILEGE_SEPARATION_BRANCH, PEP286_PRIVILEGE_SEPARATION_1, PEP244_ServerProfile-root, PEP244_ServerProfile-branch, PEP233_EmbeddedInstSupport-root, PEP233_EmbeddedInstSupport-branch, PEP214ROOT, PEP214BRANCH, PEP214-root, PEP214-branch, PEP-214B-root, PEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-string-end, PEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-rootlt, PEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-root, PEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-r2, PEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-r1, PEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-lit-end, PEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-buffer-end, PEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-branch, PEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-AtomicInt-branch, PEG25_IBM_5_16_05, NPEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-String-root, NNPEGASUS_2_5_0_PerformanceDev-String-branch, Makefile, HPUX_TEST, HEAD, CIMRS_WORK_20130824, BeforeUpdateToHeadOct82011, BUG_4225_PERFORMANCE_VERSION_1_DONE PEP#: 215 TITLE: Adding CIM29 to Repository DESCRIPTION: I added CIM 2.9 Final to the Pegasus Repository. I did NOT make any build changes. This just makes the CIM29 schema available for testing until a time is designated for switching the default schema from 2.8 to 2.9. |
// =================================================================== // Title: User_Account // $State: Exp $ // $Date: 2005/02/17 00:09:56 $ // $RCSfile: User_Account.mof,v $ // $Revision: 1.1 $ // =================================================================== //#pragma inLine ("Includes/copyright.inc") // Copyright 1998-2005 Distributed Management Task Force, Inc. (DMTF). // All rights reserved. // DMTF is a not-for-profit association of industry members dedicated // to promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability. // DMTF specifications and documents may be reproduced for uses // consistent with this purpose by members and non-members, // provided that correct attribution is given. // As DMTF specifications may be revised from time to time, // the particular version and release date should always be noted. // // Implementation of certain elements of this standard or proposed // standard may be subject to third party patent rights, including // provisional patent rights (herein "patent rights"). DMTF makes // no representations to users of the standard as to the existence // of such rights, and is not responsible to recognize, disclose, or // identify any or all such third party patent right, owners or // claimants, nor for any incomplete or inaccurate identification or // disclosure of such rights, owners or claimants. DMTF shall have no // liability to any party, in any manner or circumstance, under any // legal theory whatsoever, for failure to recognize, disclose, or // identify any such third party patent rights, or for such party's // reliance on the standard or incorporation thereof in its product, // protocols or testing procedures. DMTF shall have no liability to // any party implementing such standard, whether such implementation // is foreseeable or not, nor to any patent owner or claimant, and shall // have no liability or responsibility for costs or losses incurred if // a standard is withdrawn or modified after publication, and shall be // indemnified and held harmless by any party implementing the // standard from any and all claims of infringement by a patent owner // for such implementations. // // For information about patents held by third-parties which have // notified the DMTF that, in their opinion, such patent may relate to // or impact implementations of DMTF standards, visit // http://www.dmtf.org/about/policies/disclosures.php. //#pragma inLine // =================================================================== // Description: The User Model extends the management concepts that // are related to users and security. // This file defines the concepts and classes related to // Accounts. // // The object classes below are listed in an order that // avoids forward references. Required objects, defined // by other working groups, are omitted. // =================================================================== // Change Log for v2.8 Final // CR1218 - Accepted AccountIdentity and the deprecation of // UsersAccount // as Final // CR1235 - Added Descriptions to the properties of ManagesAccount and // SecurityServiceUsesAccount / Accepted Account's Description // change as Final // // Change Log for v2.8 Preliminary // CR1013 - Related the Account class with Identity, changed Account's // Description, added AccountIdentity and deprecated // UsersAccount // // Change Log for v2.7 - None // =================================================================== #pragma Locale ("en_US") // ================================================================== // Account // ================================================================== [Version ( "2.8.0" ), Description ( "CIM_Account is the information held by a SecurityService to " "track identity and privileges managed by that service. Common " "examples of an Account are the entries in a UNIX /etc/passwd " "file. Several kinds of security services use various " "information from those entries - the /bin/login program uses " "the account name ('root') and hashed password to authenticate " "users, and the file service, for instance, uses the UserID " "field ('0') and GroupID field ('0') to record ownership and " "determine access control privileges on files in the file " "system. This class is defined so as to incorporate " "commonly-used LDAP attributes to permit implementations to " "easily derive this information from LDAP-accessible " "directories. \n" "\n" "The semantics of Account overlap with that of the class, " "CIM_Identity. However, aspects of Account - such as its " "specific tie to a System - are valuable and have been widely " "implemented. For this reason, the Account and Identity classes " "are associated using a subclass of LogicalIdentity " "(AccountIdentity), instead of deprecating the Account class in " "the CIM Schema. When an Account has been authenticated, the " "corresponding Identity's TrustEstablished Boolean would be set " "to TRUE. Then, the Identity class can be used as defined for " "authorization purposes.")] class CIM_Account : CIM_LogicalElement { [Key, Propagated ( "CIM_System.CreationClassName" ), Description ( "The scoping System's CCN."), MaxLen ( 256 )] string SystemCreationClassName; [Key, Propagated ( "CIM_System.Name" ), Description ( "The scoping System's Name."), MaxLen ( 256 )] string SystemName; [Key, Description ( "CreationClassName indicates the name of the class or the " "subclass used in the creation of an instance. When used " "with the other key properties of this class, this property " "allows all instances of this class and its subclasses to be " "uniquely identified."), MaxLen ( 256 )] string CreationClassName; [Key, Override ( "Name" ), Description ( "The Name property defines the label by which the object is " "known. The value of this property may be set to be the same " "as that of the UserID property or, in the case of an " "LDAP-derived instance, the Name property value may be set " "to the distinguishedName of the LDAP-accessed object " "instance."), MaxLen ( 1024 )] string Name; [Description ( "UserID is the value used by the SecurityService to " "represent identity. For an authentication service, the " "UserID may be the name of the user, or for an authorization " "service the value which serves as a handle to a mapping of " "the identity."), MaxLen ( 256 )] string UserID; [Description ( "In the case of an LDAP-derived instance, the ObjectClass " "property value(s) may be set to the objectClass attribute " "values.")] string ObjectClass[]; [Description ( "The Descriptions property values may contain human-readable " "descriptions of the object. In the case of an LDAP-derived " "instance, the description attribute may have multiple " "values that, therefore, cannot be placed in the inherited " "Description property."), MaxLen ( 1024 )] string Descriptions[]; [Description ( "Based on RFC1274, the host name of the system(s) for which " "the account applies. The host name may be a fully-qualified " "DNS name or it may be an unqualified host name.")] string Host[]; [Description ( "This property contains the name of a locality, such as a " "city, county or other geographic region.")] string LocalityName[]; [Required, Description ( "The name of the organization related to the account.")] string OrganizationName[]; [Description ( "The name of an organizational unit related to the account.")] string OU[]; [Description ( "In the case of an LDAP-derived instance, the SeeAlso " "property specifies distinguished name of other Directory " "objects which may be other aspects (in some sense) of the " "same real world object.")] string SeeAlso[]; [Description ( "Based on inetOrgPerson and for directory compatibility, the " "UserCertificate property may be used to specify a public " "key certificate for the person."), OctetString] string UserCertificate[]; [Description ( "In the case of an LDAP-derived instance, the UserPassword " "property may contain an encrypted password used to access " "the person's resources in a directory."), OctetString] string UserPassword[]; }; // ================================================================== // AccountIdentity // ================================================================== [Association, Version ( "2.8.0" ), Description ( "CIM_AccountIdentity relates a system Account with the Identity " "that is established. Since Account also carries Identity " "semantics, the LogicalIdentity association is defined as the " "superclass of this association.")] class CIM_AccountIdentity : CIM_LogicalIdentity { [Override ( "SystemElement" ), Description ( "The Account that establishes Identity.")] CIM_Account REF SystemElement; [Override ( "SameElement" ), Description ( "The Identity established by the Account.")] CIM_Identity REF SameElement; }; // =================================================================== // AccountOnSystem // =================================================================== [Association, Aggregation, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description ( "A system (e.g., ApplicationSystem, ComputerSystem, " "AdminDomain) aggregates Accounts and scopes the uniqueness of " "the Account names (i.e., userids).")] class CIM_AccountOnSystem : CIM_SystemComponent { [Aggregate, Override ( "GroupComponent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ), Description ( "The aggregating system also provides name scoping for the " "Account.")] CIM_System REF GroupComponent; [Override ( "PartComponent" ), Weak, Description ( "The subordinate Account.")] CIM_Account REF PartComponent; }; // =================================================================== // UsersAccount // =================================================================== [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_AccountIdentity" }, Version ( "2.8.0" ), Description ( "This relationship associates UsersAccess with the Accounts " "with which they're able to interact. This association is " "deprecated in lieu of AccountIdentity, which defines similar " "semantics. This was done since the UsersAccess reference in " "UsersAccount has been deprecated and replaced by the more " "specific semantics of CIM_Identity.")] class CIM_UsersAccount : CIM_Dependency { [Deprecated { "CIM_AccountIdentity.SystemElement" }, Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description ( "The user's Account.")] CIM_Account REF Antecedent; [Deprecated { "CIM_AccountIdentity.SameElement" }, Override ( "Dependent" ), Description ( "The User as identified by their UsersAccess instance.")] CIM_UsersAccess REF Dependent; }; // =================================================================== // AccountMapsToAccount // =================================================================== [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description ( "This relationship may be used to associate an Account used by " "an AuthenticationService to an Account used for Authorization. " "For instance, this mapping occurs naturally in the UNIX " "/etc/passwd file, where the AuthenticationService Account " "('root') is mapped to the AuthorizationService Account ('0'). " "The two are separate accounts, as evidenced by the ability to " "have another AuthenticationService Account which ALSO maps to " "the AuthorizationService Account ('0') without ambiguity. This " "association may be used for other account mappings as well " "such as for coordinating single signon for multiple accounts " "for the same user.")] class CIM_AccountMapsToAccount : CIM_Dependency { [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description ( "An Account.")] CIM_Account REF Antecedent; [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description ( "A related Account.")] CIM_Account REF Dependent; }; // =================================================================== // SecurityServiceUsesAccount // =================================================================== [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description ( "This relationship associates SecurityService instances to the " "Accounts they use in the course of their work.")] class CIM_SecurityServiceUsesAccount : CIM_Dependency { [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description ( "Account used by the SecurityService.")] CIM_Account REF Antecedent; [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description ( "The Service using the Account.")] CIM_SecurityService REF Dependent; }; // ================================================================== // AccountManagementService // ================================================================== [Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description ( "CIM_AccountManagementService creates, manages, and if " "necessary destroys Accounts on behalf of other " "SecuritySerices.")] class CIM_AccountManagementService : CIM_SecurityService { }; // =================================================================== // ManagesAccount // =================================================================== [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description ( "This relationship associates the AccountManagement security " "service to the Accounts for which it is responsible.")] class CIM_ManagesAccount : CIM_Dependency { [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description ( "The account management service.")] CIM_AccountManagementService REF Antecedent; [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description ( "An account managed by the service.")] CIM_Account REF Dependent; }; // =================================================================== // ManagesAccountOnSystem // =================================================================== [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description ( "The CIM_ManagesAccountOnSystem provides the association " "between a System and the AccountManagementService that manages " "accounts for that system.")] class CIM_ManagesAccountOnSystem : CIM_SecurityServiceForSystem { [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description ( "An AccountManagementService that manages accounts for the " "system.")] CIM_AccountManagementService REF Antecedent; [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description ( "The system that is dependent on the " "AccountManagementService.")] CIM_System REF Dependent; }; // =================================================================== // end of file // ===================================================================
No CVS admin address has been configured |
Powered by ViewCVS 0.9.2 |