Return to Network_RoutingForwarding.mof CVS log

Up to [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIM29

PEP#: 215
TITLE: Adding CIM29 to Repository

DESCRIPTION:

I added CIM 2.9 Final to the Pegasus Repository. I did NOT make any build changes. This just makes the CIM29 schema available for testing until a time is designated for switching the default schema from 2.8 to 2.9.

// ===================================================================
// Title: Network_RoutingForwarding
// $State: Exp $
// $Date: 2005/02/17 00:09:56 $
// $RCSfile: Network_RoutingForwarding.mof,v $
// $Revision: 1.1 $
// ===================================================================
//#pragma inLine ("Includes/copyright.inc")
// Copyright 1998-2005 Distributed Management Task Force, Inc. (DMTF).
// All rights reserved.
// DMTF is a not-for-profit association of industry members dedicated
// to promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability.
// DMTF specifications and documents may be reproduced for uses
// consistent with this purpose by members and non-members,
// provided that correct attribution is given.
// As DMTF specifications may be revised from time to time,
// the particular version and release date should always be noted.
// 
// Implementation of certain elements of this standard or proposed
// standard may be subject to third party patent rights, including
// provisional patent rights (herein "patent rights"). DMTF makes
// no representations to users of the standard as to the existence
// of such rights, and is not responsible to recognize, disclose, or
// identify any or all such third party patent right, owners or
// claimants, nor for any incomplete or inaccurate identification or
// disclosure of such rights, owners or claimants. DMTF shall have no
// liability to any party, in any manner or circumstance, under any
// legal theory whatsoever, for failure to recognize, disclose, or
// identify any such third party patent rights, or for such party's
// reliance on the standard or incorporation thereof in its product,
// protocols or testing procedures. DMTF shall have no liability to
// any party implementing such standard, whether such implementation
// is foreseeable or not, nor to any patent owner or claimant, and shall
// have no liability or responsibility for costs or losses incurred if
// a standard is withdrawn or modified after publication, and shall be
// indemnified and held harmless by any party implementing the
// standard from any and all claims of infringement by a patent owner
// for such implementations.
// 
// For information about patents held by third-parties which have
// notified the DMTF that, in their opinion, such patent may relate to
// or impact implementations of DMTF standards, visit
// http://www.dmtf.org/about/policies/disclosures.php.
//#pragma inLine
// ===================================================================
// Description: The Network Model extends the management concepts to
//              represent protocol interfaces and network/protocol
//              services.  This file defines network routing and
//              forwarding services.
// 
//              The object classes below are listed in an order that
//              avoids forward references. Required objects, defined
//              by other working groups, are omitted.
// ==================================================================
// Change Log for v2.7.1
//       - Correct Min(1)->Min(0) overrides (should stay Min(1)) in
//         HostedForwardingServices and HostedRoutingServices.
// 
// Change Log for v2.7
// CR662 - Deprecate NetworkService and NetworkServicesInAdminDomain
//       - Modify Descriptions of subclasses of NetworkService
//         to clarify current status (RouteCalculationService and
//         ForwardingService)
//       - Deprecate HostingRoutingServices, HostedForwardingService
//         and LogicalNetworkService
// CR788 - Add the classes, RoutingProtocolDomain and RoutingProtocol
//         DomainInAS, from the OSPF submission
// CR866 - Cleanup of the RoutingPolicy class
// CR982 - Removal of Experimental for preliminary to final
// CR983 - v2.7 Deprecations promoted to final
// CR1009 - Correct deprecation of NetworkService.ServiceURL
// Change Log for v2.8
// CR1128 - Change subclassing from CIM_Dependency to
//          CIM_HostedDependency for identified classes. This is
//          needed as a result of the introduction of HostedDependency
//          by SysDev
// ===================================================================

#pragma Locale ("en_US")


// ==================================================================
// NetworkService
// ==================================================================
   [Deprecated { "CIM_Service" }, Abstract, Version ( "2.7.0" ), 
    Description (
       "This is an abstract base class, derived from the Service "
       "class. It is deprecated in Version 2.7 with the recommendation "
       "that the Service class be subclassed instead. Distinguishing "
       "between services that modify traffic versus supporting basic "
       "communication has not proved useful.")]
class CIM_NetworkService : CIM_Service {

      [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
          "This is a free-form array of strings that provide "
          "descriptive words and phrases that can be used in queries. "
          "To-date, this property has not been implemented, since it "
          "is not standardized. Also, if this was a necessary query "
          "construct, then it would be required higher in the "
          "inheritance hierarchy. The latter has not proven necessary. "
          "Therefore, the property is deprecated.")]
   string Keywords [ ];

      [Deprecated { "CIM_ServiceAccessURI" }, Description (
          "This is a URL that provides the protocol, network location, "
          "and other service-specific information required in order to "
          "access the service. It is deprecated with the "
          "recommendation that ServiceAccessURI be instantiated "
          "instead. This new class correctly positions the semantics "
          "of the service access, and clarifies the format of the "
          "information.")]
   string ServiceURL;

      [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
          "This is a free-form array of strings that specify any "
          "specific pre-conditions that must be met in order for this "
          "service to start correctly. It was expected that subclasses "
          "would refine the inherited StartService() method to suit "
          "their specific needs. To-date, this refinement has not been "
          "necessary. Also, the property is not very useful, since it "
          "is not standardized. If this was a necessary construct, "
          "then it would be required higher in the inheritance "
          "hierarchy (on Service). The latter has not proven true. "
          "Therefore, the property is deprecated.")]
   string StartupConditions [ ];

      [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
          "This is a free-form array of strings that specify any "
          "specific parameters that must be supplied to the "
          "StartService() method in order for this service to start "
          "correctly. It was expected that subclasses would refine the "
          "inherited StartService() methods to suit their specific "
          "needs. To-date, this refinement has not been necessary. If "
          "indeed the method were refined, then its parameters would "
          "more formally convey this information. Therefore, the "
          "property is deprecated.")]
   string StartupParameters [ ];
};


// ==================================================================
// NetworkServicesInAdminDomain
// ==================================================================
   [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_HostedDependency" },
       Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This association establishes the Dependency relationships that "
       "exist between an administrative domain and the Network "
       "Services that it hosts. It is deprecated since AdminDomains "
       "can contain any ManagedSystemElements. There is no special "
       "relationship needed for NetworkServices. In addition, the Min "
       "(1) cardinality on AdminDomain is not valid - since it may not "
       "be possible to define every NetworkService in the context of "
       "one or more Domains.")]
class CIM_NetworkServicesInAdminDomain : CIM_HostedDependency {

      [Deprecated { "CIM_Dependency.Antecedent" },
          Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
          "The AdminDomain that hosts and administers the various "
          "network services.")]
   CIM_AdminDomain REF Antecedent;

      [Deprecated { "CIM_Dependency.Dependent" },
          Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
          "The network service that is hosted in the administrative "
          "domain.")]
   CIM_NetworkService REF Dependent;
};


// ==================================================================
// LogicalNetworkService
// ==================================================================
   [Association, Deprecated { "No value" }, Version ( "2.7.0" ), 
    Description (
       "A LogicalNetworkService represents network services that "
       "either originate and/or terminate in a LogicalNetwork. This "
       "association is deprecated since LogicalNetworks aggregate "
       "ProtocolEndpoints, not their backing Services.")]
class CIM_LogicalNetworkService {

      [Deprecated { "No value" }, Key, Description (
          "The LogicalNetwork that contains the network service.")]
   CIM_LogicalNetwork REF Network;

      [Deprecated { "No value" }, Key, Description (
          "The NetworkService that is running in the LogicalNetwork.")]
   CIM_NetworkService REF NetworkService;

      [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
          "An enumeration that explicitly defines this network service "
          "as originating, terminating, or residing in this "
          "LogicalNetwork."), 
       ValueMap { "0", "1", "2", "3" }, 
       Values { "Unknown", "Originates In", "Terminates In",
          "Resides In" }]
   uint16 ContainmentType;
};


// ==================================================================
// ForwardingService
// ==================================================================
   [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This class represents the functions used in forwarding network "
       "traffic. Its instances act on packets received from one or "
       "more ProtocolEndpoints or Services, and drop (discard), or "
       "send those packets to one or more other ProtocolEndpoints or "
       "Services. The explicit Endpoints being forwarded between, are "
       "described using the ForwardsAmong association (or one of its "
       "subclasses). Generally, the Endpoints are at the same protocol "
       "layer and are usually of similar types, or of the same type. "
       "ForwardingService is different than RouteCalculation Service "
       "in that it represents the function of forwarding traffic "
       "independent of calculating routing information. \n"
       "\n"
       "Examining the ForwardingService class definition, note that "
       "its superclass NetworkService is deprecated. Therefore, "
       "NetworkService's properties need not be implemented in an "
       "instance of ForwardingService. Unfortunately, NetworkService "
       "cannot be removed from the object hierarchy without a major "
       "Schema release. When/if this occurs, the NetworkService "
       "superclass will be removed, and ForwardingService will "
       "subclass from CIM_Service directly. Also note that there are a "
       "large number of additional protocols that are not currently "
       "modeled. These will be added over time.")]
class CIM_ForwardingService : CIM_NetworkService {

      [Description (
          "This defines the type of protocol that is being forwarded."), 
       ValueMap { "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9",
          "10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19" }, 
       Values { "Unknown", "Other", "IPv4", "IPv6", "IPv4/IPv6", "IPX",
          "AppleTalk", "DECnet", "SNA", "CONP", "CLNP", "VINES", "XNS",
          "ATM", "Frame Relay", "Ethernet", "TokenRing", "FDDI",
          "Infiniband", "Fibre Channel" }, 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_ForwardingService.OtherProtocolType" 
          }]
   uint16 ProtocolType;

      [Description (
          "This defines the type of protocol that is being forwarded "
          "when the value of the ProtocolType attribute is 1 (i.e., "
          "\"Other\"). This provides for future extensibility."), 
       MaxLen ( 32 ), 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_ForwardingService.ProtocolType" }]
   string OtherProtocolType;
};


// ==================================================================
// ForwardsAmong
// ==================================================================
   [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description (
       "This association represents the dependency that exists between "
       "the ProtocolEndpoints that are used to forward data and the "
       "ForwardingService that is performing the forwarding of data.")]
class CIM_ForwardsAmong : CIM_ServiceSAPDependency {

      [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
          "The ProtocolEndpoints that are used to forward the data.")]
   CIM_ProtocolEndpoint REF Antecedent;

      [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
          "The service that is forwarding the data.")]
   CIM_ForwardingService REF Dependent;
};


// ==================================================================
// HostedForwardingServices
// ==================================================================
   [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService" },
    Version ( "2.7.1" ), Description (
       "This is a specialization of CIM_HostedService, which is an "
       "association between a Service and the System on which the "
       "functionality resides. The class, HostedForwardingServices, is "
       "deprecated since it provides no additional semantics over "
       "HostedService, and unecessarily restricts the Service to a "
       "single ComputerSystem, when the Service could reside in a "
       "Network or other higher level System.")]
class CIM_HostedForwardingServices : CIM_HostedService {

      [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Antecedent" },
          Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ), 
       Description (
          "The hosting router.")]
   CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;

      [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Dependent" },
          Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
          "The Service hosted on the System.")]
   CIM_ForwardingService REF Dependent;
};


// ==================================================================
// RouteCalculationService
// ==================================================================
   [Abstract, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This is an abstract base class, derived from Service, that "
       "represents the route calculation aspects of a system. This "
       "class also addresses functions performed by the system when it "
       "exchanges routing information. \n"
       "\n"
       "Examining the RouteCalculationService class definition, note "
       "that its superclass NetworkService is deprecated. Therefore, "
       "NetworkService's properties need not be implemented in an "
       "instance of RouteCalculationService. Unfortunately, "
       "NetworkService cannot be removed from the object hierarchy "
       "without a major Schema release. When/if this occurs, the "
       "NetworkService superclass will be removed, and "
       "RouteCalculationService will subclass from CIM_Service "
       "directly. Also note that there are a large number of "
       "additional routing protocols that are not currently modeled. "
       "These will be added over time.")]
class CIM_RouteCalculationService : CIM_NetworkService {

      [Description (
          "The RouterID uniquely identifies the router that is "
          "performing the route calculation. It is the highest IP "
          "address on the router (or the highest loopback interface, "
          "if there is one).")]
   string RouterID;

      [Description (
          "This is an enumerated value that defines the routing "
          "algorithm used in this route calculation."), 
       ValueMap { "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8" }, 
       Values { "Unknown", "RIPv1", "RIPv2", "OSPFv1", "OSPFv2",
          "BGPv1", "BGPv2", "BGPv3", "BGPv4" }]
   uint16 AlgorithmType;
};


// ==================================================================
// CalculatesAmong
// ==================================================================
   [Association, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This is a specialization of the ServiceSAPDependency "
       "association, indicating that the referenced ProtocolEndpoint "
       "is utilized by the RouteCalculationService to provide its "
       "functionality.")]
class CIM_CalculatesAmong : CIM_ServiceSAPDependency {

      [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
          "The required ProtocolEndpoint.")]
   CIM_ProtocolEndpoint REF Antecedent;

      [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
          "The RouteCalculationService, which is dependent on the "
          "underlying ProtocolEndpoint.")]
   CIM_RouteCalculationService REF Dependent;

      [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
          "TRUE indicates that this ProtocolEndpoint represents a "
          "static route, and FALSE means that it represents a "
          "dynamically-learned route. This property is deprecated "
          "since a Service may use an Endpoint to output several "
          "routes, some static and others dynamic.")]
   boolean IsStatic;
};


// ==================================================================
// HostedRoutingServices
// ==================================================================
   [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService" },
    Version ( "2.7.1" ), Description (
       "This is a specialization of CIM_HostedService, which is an "
       "association between a Service and the System on which the "
       "functionality resides. The class, HostedRoutingServices, is "
       "deprecated since it provides no additional semantics over "
       "HostedService, and unecessarily restricts the Service to a "
       "single ComputerSystem, when the Service could reside in a "
       "Network or other higher level System.")]
class CIM_HostedRoutingServices : CIM_HostedService {

      [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Antecedent" },
          Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ), 
       Description (
          "The hosting router.")]
   CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;

      [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Dependent" },
          Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
          "The Service hosted on the System.")]
   CIM_RouteCalculationService REF Dependent;
};


// ====================================================================
// RoutingProtocolDomain
// ====================================================================
   [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "A Routing Protocol Domain is a collection of routers which "
       "coordinate their routing knowledge using a single [instance of "
       "a] routing protocol. This class represents the "
       "area/layer/level/zone like property of a routing protocol, "
       "such as an OSPF (area), IS-IS (layer) or PNNI (level). It does "
       "not represent the entire routing domain in every case. For "
       "example for OSPF, it represents an Area, but in the case of "
       "RIP, it represents the whole RIP domain. Any common attributes "
       "of these routing domains can be placed in this class in future "
       "versions of CIM.")]
class CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain : CIM_AdminDomain {
};


// ====================================================================
// RoutingProtocolDomainInAS
// ====================================================================
   [Association, Aggregation, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This assocation connects an AutonomousSystem to the routing "
       "domains that it contains.")]
class CIM_RoutingProtocolDomainInAS : CIM_ContainedDomain {

      [Aggregate, Override ( "GroupComponent" ), Max ( 1 ), 
       Description (
          "The autonomous system.")]
   CIM_AutonomousSystem REF GroupComponent;

      [Override ( "PartComponent" ), Description (
          "The routing domain.")]
   CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain REF PartComponent;
};


// ==================================================================
// RoutingPolicy
// ==================================================================
   [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This class is used to implement routing policies. It "
       "aggregates a set of FilterLists, along with other appropriate "
       "constructs, into a unit. One of the most important uses of "
       "this class is to change the routing policy by changing values "
       "of various attributes in a consistent manner. \n"
       "\n"
       "A RoutingPolicy is weak to the network device (i.e., the "
       "ComputerSystem) that contains it. Hence, the ComputerSystem "
       "keys are propagated to this class. \n"
       "\n"
       "Note that this class was defined before the Policy Model and "
       "hence is not positioned in that hierarchy. The class will be "
       "repositioned in a later release of the Network Model.")]
class CIM_RoutingPolicy : CIM_LogicalElement {

      [Key, Propagated ( "CIM_ComputerSystem.CreationClassName" ), 
       Description (
          "The scoping ComputerSystem's CreationClassName."), 
       MaxLen ( 256 )]
   string SystemCreationClassName;

      [Key, Propagated ( "CIM_ComputerSystem.Name" ), Description (
          "The scoping ComputerSystem's Name."), 
       MaxLen ( 256 )]
   string SystemName;

      [Key, Description (
          "CreationClassName indicates the name of the class or the "
          "subclass used in the creation of an instance. When used "
          "with the other key properties of this class, this property "
          "allows all instances of this class and its subclasses to be "
          "uniquely identified."), 
       MaxLen ( 256 )]
   string CreationClassName;

      [Key, Override ( "Name" ), Description (
          "This is the name of the Routing Policy."), 
       MaxLen ( 256 )]
   string Name;

      [Description (
          "This defines the type of action that will be performed if "
          "the match conditions of the policy are met. The match "
          "conditions are defined by the associated ListsIn "
          "RoutingPolicy. There are essentially three choices: forward "
          "the traffic unmodified, forward the traffic but modify "
          "either the attributes describing the route and/or other "
          "attributes that define how to condition the traffic (e.g., "
          "its ToS byte settings), or prevent the traffic from being "
          "forwarded."), 
       ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9" }, 
       Values { "Accept As Is",
          "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes",
          "Accept and Remark Packet",
          "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes and Remark",
          "Accept With Other Action",
          "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes and Other Action",
          "Accept with Remark and Other Action",
          "Accept with Protocol Attribute Changes, Remark and Other "
           "Action", "Deny" }]
   uint16 Action;

      [Description (
          "This controls whether protocol-specific attributes replace, "
          "get prepended, or get appended to their existing values."), 
       ValueMap { "1", "2", "3" }, 
       Values { "Replace", "Prepend", "Append" }, 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.BGPAction" }]
   uint16 AttributeAction;

      [Description (
          "This defines one or more BGP-specific attributes that "
          "should be used to modify this routing update."), 
       ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10" }, 
       Values { "Origin", "AS_Path", "NEXT_HOP", "Multi_Exit_Disc",
          "Local_Pref", "Atomic_Aggregate", "Aggregator", "Community",
          "Originator_ID", "Cluster_List" }, 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.BGPValue" }]
   uint16 BGPAction;

      [Description (
          "The value for the corresponding BGPAction."), 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.BGPAction" }]
   string BGPValue;

      [Description (
          "This defines a remarking action for this traffic."), 
       ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7" }, 
       Values { "Change DSCP", "Change ToS", "Change 802.1Q Value",
          "Change CIR", "Change CBR", "Change ABR", "Change VBR" }, 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.RemarkValue" }]
   uint16 RemarkAction;

      [Description (
          "The value for the corresponding RemarkAction."), 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.RemarkAction" }]
   string RemarkValue;

      [Description (
          "This defines another action to be taken for this traffic."), 
       ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7" }, 
       Values { "Other", "Input Flow Policing", "Output Flow Policing",
          "Input Aggregate Policing", "Output Aggregate Policing",
          "Police By Marking Down", "Police By Dropping Down" }, 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningValue",
          "CIM_RoutingPolicy.OtherConditioningAction" }]
   uint16 ConditioningAction;

      [Description (
          "If the value of the ConditioningAction property of this "
          "class is 1, this contains an application-specific type of "
          "conditioning that is to be performed. Otherwise, if the "
          "ConditioningAction property is any other value, the value "
          "of this property should be NULL."), 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningAction" }]
   string OtherConditioningAction;

      [Description (
          "The value for the corresponding ConditioningAction, if "
          "appropriate."), 
       ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningAction" }]
   string ConditioningValue;
};


// ==================================================================
// HostedRoutingPolicy
// ==================================================================
   [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description (
       "A RoutingPolicy is weak to the network device (i.e., the "
       "ComputerSystem) that contains it. This association formalizes "
       "that relationship.")]
class CIM_HostedRoutingPolicy : CIM_HostedDependency {

      [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ), Description (
          "The network device/computer system that scopes the "
          "RoutingPolicy.")]
   CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;

      [Override ( "Dependent" ), Weak, Description (
          "The routing policy defined in the context of the network "
          "device.")]
   CIM_RoutingPolicy REF Dependent;
};


// ==================================================================
// ListsInRoutingPolicy
// ==================================================================
   [Association, Aggregation, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description (
       "This is a specialization of the CIM_Component aggregation "
       "which is used to define a set of FilterLists that are "
       "aggregated by a particular RoutingPolicy.")]
class CIM_ListsInRoutingPolicy : CIM_Component {

      [Aggregate, Override ( "GroupComponent" ), Description (
          "The RoutingPolicy, which aggregates the set of FilterLists.")]
   CIM_RoutingPolicy REF GroupComponent;

      [Override ( "PartComponent" ), Description (
          "A FilterList, which is part-of the RoutingPolicy.")]
   CIM_FilterList REF PartComponent;

      [Description (
          "The position of the FilterList relative to all other "
          "entries in the RoutingPolicy.")]
   uint16 ListSequence;
};


// ===================================================================
// end of file
// ===================================================================