Return to Network_OSPF.mof CVS log

Up to [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIM29

PEP#: 215
TITLE: Adding CIM29 to Repository

DESCRIPTION:

I added CIM 2.9 Final to the Pegasus Repository. I did NOT make any build changes. This just makes the CIM29 schema available for testing until a time is designated for switching the default schema from 2.8 to 2.9.

// ===================================================================
// Title: Network_OSPF
// $State: Exp $
// $Date: 2005/02/17 00:09:56 $
// $RCSfile: Network_OSPF.mof,v $
// $Revision: 1.1 $
// ===================================================================
//#pragma inLine ("Includes/copyright.inc")
// Copyright 1998-2005 Distributed Management Task Force, Inc. (DMTF).
// All rights reserved.
// DMTF is a not-for-profit association of industry members dedicated
// to promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability.
// DMTF specifications and documents may be reproduced for uses
// consistent with this purpose by members and non-members,
// provided that correct attribution is given.
// As DMTF specifications may be revised from time to time,
// the particular version and release date should always be noted.
// 
// Implementation of certain elements of this standard or proposed
// standard may be subject to third party patent rights, including
// provisional patent rights (herein "patent rights"). DMTF makes
// no representations to users of the standard as to the existence
// of such rights, and is not responsible to recognize, disclose, or
// identify any or all such third party patent right, owners or
// claimants, nor for any incomplete or inaccurate identification or
// disclosure of such rights, owners or claimants. DMTF shall have no
// liability to any party, in any manner or circumstance, under any
// legal theory whatsoever, for failure to recognize, disclose, or
// identify any such third party patent rights, or for such party's
// reliance on the standard or incorporation thereof in its product,
// protocols or testing procedures. DMTF shall have no liability to
// any party implementing such standard, whether such implementation
// is foreseeable or not, nor to any patent owner or claimant, and shall
// have no liability or responsibility for costs or losses incurred if
// a standard is withdrawn or modified after publication, and shall be
// indemnified and held harmless by any party implementing the
// standard from any and all claims of infringement by a patent owner
// for such implementations.
// 
// For information about patents held by third-parties which have
// notified the DMTF that, in their opinion, such patent may relate to
// or impact implementations of DMTF standards, visit
// http://www.dmtf.org/about/policies/disclosures.php.
//#pragma inLine
// ===================================================================
// Description: The Network Model extends the management concepts to
//              represent protocol interfaces and network/protocol
//              services.  This file defines classes to manage OSPF
//              (Open Shortest Path First).
// 
//              The object classes below are listed in an order that
//              avoids forward references. Required objects, defined
//              by other working groups, are omitted.
// ==================================================================
// Change Log for v2.7
// CR788 - Add classes to support OSPF
// CR806 - Update the OSPF model to take into account the
//         RangeOfIPAddresses class (vs IPAddressRange)
// CR837 - Add the property RFC1583Compatibility to OSPFService, and
//         add the property StubMetricType to OSPFAreaConfiguration
// CR863 - Update the format of the MappingStrings qualifier when
//         referencing IETF RFCs
// CR903 - Correction of EndpointInLink.Member reference.
// CR959 - Reposition OSPFLink using the ConnectivityCollection class
// CR982 - Removal of Experimental for preliminary to final
// CR994 - Update of the InstanceID property Description
// Change Log for v2.8
// CR1231 - Update references
//        Property CIM_OSPFService.RunningMOSPF
//        (CIM_OSPFServiceCapabillities.SupportMOSPF)
// ===================================================================

#pragma Locale ("en_US")


// ====================================================================
// OSPFArea
// ====================================================================
   [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This class represents an OSPF area. The definition of an OSPF "
       "area from RFC2328, is 'OSPF allows sets of networks to be "
       "grouped together. Such a grouping is called an area. The "
       "topology of an area is hidden from the rest of the Autonomous "
       "System. This information hiding enables a significant "
       "reduction in routing traffic. Also, routing within the area is "
       "determined only by the area's own topology, lending the area "
       "protection from bad routing data.' This class has a 'Type' "
       "propery, which distinguishes between the different area types. "
       "This approach was chosen, because it provides a simpler way to "
       "indicate the type of an area, and additional subclassing is "
       "not needed at this time.")]
class CIM_OSPFArea : CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain {

      [Description (
          "The area ID of this OSPF area, see C.2 in RFC 2328."), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfAreaId" }]
   uint32 AreaID;

      [Required, Description (
          "The type of the OSPF area."), 
       ValueMap { "2", "3", "4" }, 
       Values { "Plain", "Stub", "NSSA" }]
   uint16 AreaType;

      [Description (
          "When the number of non-default AS-external-LSAs in a "
          "router's link-state database reaches this limit, the router "
          "enters OverflowState, see 2.1 in RFC 1765."), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfExtLsdbLimit" }]
   uint32 ExtLsdbLimit;
};


// ====================================================================
// OSPFService
// ====================================================================
   [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This class is used to represent the basic operation of OSPF. "
       "It is derived from the RouteCalculationService, the superclass "
       "of all routing protocols.")]
class CIM_OSPFService : CIM_RouteCalculationService {

      [Description (
          "This attribute indicates whether this router is running "
          "MOSPF (multicast enhancements to OSPF) or not, see B.1 in "
          "RFC 1584. This attribute only can be true, when the "
          "SupportMOSPF property in OSPFService Capabilities is also "
          "true. If SupportMOSPF is false, then this property has no "
          "meaning."), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfMulticastExtensions" }]
   boolean RunningMOSPF;

      [Description (
          "This attribute indicates whether this router will forward "
          "multicast datagrams between OSPF areas or not, see B.1 in "
          "RFC 1584."), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfMulticastExtensions" }]
   boolean IsInterAreaMulticastForwarder;

      [Description (
          "This attribute indicates whether this router will forward "
          "multicast datagrams between Autonomous Systems or not, see "
          "B.1 in RFC 1584."), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfMulticastExtensions" }]
   boolean IsInterAsMulticastForwarder;

      [Description (
          "The number of seconds that, after entering OverflowState, a "
          "router will attempt to leave OverflowState. When set to 0, "
          "the router will not leave OverflowState until restarted, "
          "see 2.1 in RFC 1765."), 
       Units ( "Seconds" ), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfExitOverflowInterval" }]
   uint32 ExitOverflowInterval;

      [Description (
          "Controls the preference rules used in choosing among "
          "multiple AS-external-LSAs advertising the same destination. "
          "When set to TRUE, the preference rules remain those "
          "specified by RFC 1583. When set to FALSE, the preference "
          "rules are those stated in RFC 2328, which prevent routing "
          "loops when AS-external-LSAs for the same destination have "
          "been originated from different areas. See C.1 in RFC2328.")]
   boolean RFC1583Compatibility;
};


// ==================================================================
// OSPFServiceCapabilities
// ==================================================================
   [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "The OSPFServiceCapabilities class represents the capabilities "
       "of an OSPF service.")]
class CIM_OSPFServiceCapabilities : CIM_Capabilities {

      [Description (
          "This attribute indicates whether this router supports NSSA "
          "(\"not-so-stubby\") areas or not, see RFC 1587.")]
   boolean SupportNSSA;

      [Description (
          "This attribute indicates whether this router supports "
          "on-demand circuits or not, see RFC 1793."), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfDemandExtensions" }]
   boolean SupportOnDemand;

      [Description (
          "This attribute indicates whether this router supports MOSPF "
          "(multicast enhancements to OSPF) or not, see B.1 in RFC "
          "1584."), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfMulticastExtensions" }]
   boolean SupportMOSPF;
};


// ====================================================================
// OSPFAreaConfiguration
// ====================================================================
   [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "Each OSPF router has an association to one or more OSPF areas. "
       "Into these areas, a router advertises summaries filtered by "
       "specific address ranges. This would natively be modeled as a "
       "ternary association (router/OSPFService to OSPFArea to "
       "RangeOfIPAddresses), which is problematic in some "
       "implementations. To get around this issue, the "
       "OSPFAreaConfiguration class is defined to act as a focal point "
       "to bring together the router (indicated as a ComputerSystem "
       "with an instance of OSPFService, associated to the "
       "AreaConfiguration using OSPFServiceConfiguration), the area "
       "(indicated as an OSPFArea, associated to the AreaConfiguration "
       "using AreaOfConfiguration) and the address ranges for "
       "advertising (indicated as instances of RangeOfIPAddresses, "
       "associated to the AreaConfiguration using "
       "RangesOfConfiguration). There would be an instance of "
       "OSPFAreaConfiguration for each connected area of a "
       "router/OSPFService. \n"
       "\n"
       "When network administrators want to control the advertisements "
       "of OSPF routers by filters, they first define the relevant "
       "ranges. In order for a router to handle a range, an instance "
       "of RangeOfIPAddresses MUST be associated to the relevant "
       "OSPFAreaConfiguration (using the relationship, RangesOf "
       "Configuration). The association between the range and area "
       "configuration contains a property defining the handling "
       "(EnableAdvertise) to allow or disallow advertisements in the "
       "range. \n"
       "\n"
       "Notes: \n"
       "- Because RangeOfIPAddresses is scoped by a System (via the "
       "HostedCollection association), an instance of "
       "RangeOfIPAddresses would be associated to an OSPFArea, "
       "satisfying this semantic. \n"
       "- This class is inherited from LogicalElement, because a "
       "suitable subclass 'lower' in the inheritance hiearchy does not "
       "exist.")]
class CIM_OSPFAreaConfiguration : CIM_LogicalElement {

      [Key, Description (
          "Within the scope of the instantiating Namespace, InstanceID "
          "opaquely and uniquely identifies an instance of this class. "
          "In order to ensure uniqueness within the NameSpace, the "
          "value of InstanceID SHOULD be constructed using the "
          "following 'preferred' algorithm: \n"
          "<OrgID>:<OSPFService ID><Area Configuration ID> \n"
          "where: \n"
          "<OrgID> and the remainder of the InstanceID are separated "
          "by a colon ':', and where <OrgID> MUST include a "
          "copyrighted, trademarked or otherwise unique name that is "
          "owned by the business entity creating/defining the "
          "InstanceID, or is a registered ID that is assigned to the "
          "business entity by a recognized global authority. (This is "
          "similar to the <Schema Name>_<Class Name> structure of "
          "Schema class names.) In addition, to ensure uniqueness "
          "<OrgID> MUST NOT contain a colon (':'). When using this "
          "algorithm, the first colon to appear in InstanceID MUST "
          "appear between <OrgID> and the <OSPFService ID>. For DMTF "
          "defined instances, the 'preferred' algorithm MUST be used, "
          "and the <OrgID> set to 'CIM'. \n"
          "<OSPFService ID> and <Area Configuration ID> MUST specify "
          "vendor-unique identifiers for the OSPFService and "
          "AreaConfiguration.")]
   string InstanceID;

      [Description (
          "This attribute contains the value of the default route that "
          "this router advertises into a stub area, see C.2 RFC 2328."), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfStubMetric" }]
   uint32 StubDefaultCost;

      [Description (
          "This attribute contains the type of metric advertised as a "
          "default route into a stub area, see 3. in RFC 1850."), 
       ValueMap { "2", "3", "4" }, 
       Values { "OSPF Metric", "Comparable Cost", "NonComparable" }, 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfStubMetricType" }]
   uint16 StubMetricType;
};


// ====================================================================
// OSPFLink
// ====================================================================
   [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This class is used to represent OSPF connectivity between two "
       "or more OSPF protocol endpoints.")]
class CIM_OSPFLink : CIM_ConnectivityCollection {

      [Required, Description (
          "The type of the OSPF link, see section 1.2 in RFC 2328."), 
       ValueMap { "2", "3", "4", "5" }, 
       Values { "Point-To-Point", "Point-To-Multipoint", "Broadcast",
          "NBMA" }]
   uint16 LinkType;

      [Description (
          "The time, in seconds, between sending OSPF Hello-packets "
          "over the interface, see section C.3 in RFC 2328."), 
       Units ( "Seconds" ), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfIfHelloInterval" }]
   uint32 HelloInterval;

      [Description (
          "After ceasing to hear a router's Hello-packets, the number "
          "of seconds before its neighbors declare the router down, "
          "see section C.3 in RFC 2328."), 
       Units ( "Seconds" ), 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfIfRtrDeadInterval" }]
   uint32 RouterDeadInterval;

      [Required, Description (
          "This parameter indicates whether IP multicast datagrams "
          "should be forwarded over this OSPF link, and if so, how the "
          "forwarding should be done, see section B.2 in RFC 1584."), 
       ValueMap { "2", "3", "4" }, 
       Values { "Disabled", "Data-link Multicast",
       "Data-link Unicast" }, 
       MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfIfMulticastForwarding" }]
   uint16 MulticastForwarding;
};

// ====================================================================
// AreaOfConfiguration
// ====================================================================
   [Association, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This association connects an area configuration to its area. "
       "The OSPFAreaConfiguration class is defined to act as a focal "
       "point to bring together the router (indicated as a "
       "ComputerSystem with an instance of OSPFService, associated to "
       "the AreaConfiguration using OSPFServiceConfiguration), the "
       "area (indicated as an OSPFArea, associated to the "
       "AreaConfiguration using AreaOfConfiguration) and the address "
       "ranges for advertising (indicated as instances of "
       "RangeOfIPAddresses, associated to the AreaConfiguration using "
       "RangesOfConfiguration). There is an instance of "
       "OSPFAreaConfiguration for each connected area of a "
       "router/OSPFService.")]
class CIM_AreaOfConfiguration : CIM_Dependency {

      [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Max ( 1 ), Description (
          "The OSPF area.")]
   CIM_OSPFArea REF Antecedent ;

      [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
          "The configuration which is applied to an OSPF area. This is "
          "the Dependent reference in this association, since it "
          "depends on the area for any functional significance.")]
   CIM_OSPFAreaConfiguration REF Dependent;
};


// ====================================================================
// OSPFServiceConfiguration
// ====================================================================
   [Association, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "OSPFServiceConfiguration connects an OSPF service to its area "
       "configurations. The configurations are defined for the OSPF "
       "Service, and so do not make sense as stand alone objects. This "
       "is the reason for the Min (1), Max (1) cardinalities on "
       "OSPFService. They mandate the instantiation of the service and "
       "of this association for the referenced instance of "
       "OSPFAreaConfiguration. The area configuration acts as a focal "
       "point to bring together the router (indicated as a "
       "ComputerSystem with an instance of OSPFService, associated to "
       "the AreaConfiguration using this relationship), the area "
       "(indicated as an OSPFArea, associated to the AreaConfiguration "
       "using AreaOfConfiguration) and the address ranges for "
       "advertising (indicated as instances of RangeOfIPAddresses, "
       "associated to the AreaConfiguration using "
       "RangesOfConfiguration). There would be an instance of "
       "OSPFAreaConfiguration for each connected area of a "
       "router/OSPFService.")]
class CIM_OSPFServiceConfiguration : CIM_Dependency {

      [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ), Description (
          "The OSPF service.")]
   CIM_OSPFService REF Antecedent ;

      [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
          "The area configuration.")]
   CIM_OSPFAreaConfiguration REF Dependent;
};


// ====================================================================
// RangesOfConfiguration
// ====================================================================
   [Association, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This association connects address ranges to the OSPF area "
       "configuration. When network administrators want to control the "
       "advertisements of OSPF routers by filters, they first define "
       "the relevant ranges. In order for a router to handle a range, "
       "an instance of RangeOfIPAddresses MUST be associated to the "
       "router's OSPFAreaConfiguration, using this relationship. The "
       "association between the range and area configuration contains "
       "a property (EnableAdvertise) defining the handling - to allow "
       "or disallow advertismenets in the range.")]
class CIM_RangesOfConfiguration : CIM_Dependency {

      [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
          "The address range that is in the OSPF area configuration.")]
   CIM_RangeOfIPAddresses REF Antecedent;

      [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
          "The OSPF area configuration that contains the range.")]
   CIM_OSPFAreaConfiguration REF Dependent;

      [Description (
          "The address range is advertised (TRUE) or not (FALSE), see "
          "C.2 in RFC 2328.")]
   boolean EnableAdvertise;
};


// ====================================================================
// EndpointInLink
// ====================================================================
   [Association, Aggregation, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
       "This association connects an OSPFLink to the OSPFProtocol "
       "Endpoints that this link aggregates.")]
class CIM_EndpointInLink : CIM_MemberOfCollection {

      [Aggregate, Override ( "Collection" ), Max ( 1 ), Description (
          "The OSPF link.")]
   CIM_OSPFLink REF Collection;

      [Override ( "Member" ), Description (
          "The OSPF protocol endpoint.")]
   CIM_OSPFProtocolEndpointBase REF Member;
};


// ====================================================================
// EndpointInArea
// ====================================================================
   [Association, Aggregation, Composition, Version ( "2.7.0" ), 
    Description (
       "This relation connects an OSPF endpoint to an area.")]
class CIM_EndpointInArea : CIM_Component {

      [Aggregate, Override ( "GroupComponent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ), 
       Description (
          "The OSPF area.")]
   CIM_OSPFArea REF GroupComponent;

      [Override ( "PartComponent" ), Description (
          "The OSPF endpoint in the area.")]
   CIM_OSPFProtocolEndpointBase REF PartComponent;
};


// ===================================================================
// end of file
// ===================================================================