1 tony 1.1 // ===================================================================
2 // Title: Network Routing and Forwarding Services 2.8
3 // Filename: Network28_RoutingForwarding.mof
4 // Version: 2.8.0
5 // Status: Final
6 // Date: Jan 26, 2004
7 // ===================================================================
8 // Copyright 1998-2003 Distributed Management Task Force, Inc. (DMTF).
9 // All rights reserved.
10 // DMTF is a not-for-profit association of industry members dedicated
11 // to promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability.
12 // DMTF specifications and documents may be reproduced for uses
13 // consistent with this purpose by members and non-members,
14 // provided that correct attribution is given.
15 // As DMTF specifications may be revised from time to time,
16 // the particular version and release date should always be noted.
17 //
18 // Implementation of certain elements of this standard or proposed
19 // standard may be subject to third party patent rights, including
20 // provisional patent rights (herein "patent rights"). DMTF makes
21 // no representations to users of the standard as to the existence
22 tony 1.1 // of such rights, and is not responsible to recognize, disclose, or
23 // identify any or all such third party patent right, owners or
24 // claimants, nor for any incomplete or inaccurate identification or
25 // disclosure of such rights, owners or claimants. DMTF shall have no
26 // liability to any party, in any manner or circumstance, under any
27 // legal theory whatsoever, for failure to recognize, disclose, or
28 // identify any such third party patent rights, or for such party's
29 // reliance on the standard or incorporation thereof in its product,
30 // protocols or testing procedures. DMTF shall have no liability to
31 // any party implementing such standard, whether such implementation
32 // is foreseeable or not, nor to any patent owner or claimant, and shall
33 // have no liability or responsibility for costs or losses incurred if
34 // a standard is withdrawn or modified after publication, and shall be
35 // indemnified and held harmless by any party implementing the
36 // standard from any and all claims of infringement by a patent owner
37 // for such implementations.
38 //
39 // For information about patents held by third-parties which have
40 // notified the DMTF that, in their opinion, such patent may relate to
41 // or impact implementations of DMTF standards, visit
42 // http://www.dmtf.org/about/policies/disclosures.php.
43 tony 1.1 // ===================================================================
44 // Description: The Network Model extends the management concepts to
45 // represent protocol interfaces and network/protocol
46 // services. This file defines network routing and
47 // forwarding services.
48 //
49 // The object classes below are listed in an order that
50 // avoids forward references. Required objects, defined
51 // by other working groups, are omitted.
52 // ==================================================================
53 // Change Log for v2.7.1
54 // - Correct Min(1)->Min(0) overrides (should stay Min(1)) in
55 // HostedForwardingServices and HostedRoutingServices.
56 //
57 // Change Log for v2.7
58 // CR662 - Deprecate NetworkService and NetworkServicesInAdminDomain
59 // - Modify Descriptions of subclasses of NetworkService
60 // to clarify current status (RouteCalculationService and
61 // ForwardingService)
62 // - Deprecate HostingRoutingServices, HostedForwardingService
63 // and LogicalNetworkService
64 tony 1.1 // CR788 - Add the classes, RoutingProtocolDomain and RoutingProtocol
65 // DomainInAS, from the OSPF submission
66 // CR866 - Cleanup of the RoutingPolicy class
67 // CR982 - Removal of Experimental for preliminary to final
68 // CR983 - v2.7 Deprecations promoted to final
69 // CR1009 - Correct deprecation of NetworkService.ServiceURL
70 // Change Log for v2.8
71 // CR1128 - Change subclassing from CIM_Dependency to
72 // CIM_HostedDependency for identified classes. This is
73 // needed as a result of the introduction of HostedDependency
74 // by SysDev
75 // ===================================================================
76
77 #pragma Locale ("en_US")
78
79
80 // ==================================================================
81 // NetworkService
82 // ==================================================================
83 [Deprecated { "CIM_Service" }, Abstract, Version ( "2.7.0" ),
84 Description (
85 tony 1.1 "This is an abstract base class, derived from the Service "
86 "class. It is deprecated in Version 2.7 with the recommendation "
87 "that the Service class be subclassed instead. Distinguishing "
88 "between services that modify traffic versus supporting basic "
89 "communication has not proved useful.")]
90 class CIM_NetworkService : CIM_Service {
91
92 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
93 "This is a free-form array of strings that provide "
94 "descriptive words and phrases that can be used in queries. "
95 "To-date, this property has not been implemented, since it "
96 "is not standardized. Also, if this was a necessary query "
97 "construct, then it would be required higher in the "
98 "inheritance hierarchy. The latter has not proven necessary. "
99 "Therefore, the property is deprecated.")]
100 string Keywords [ ];
101
102 [Deprecated { "CIM_ServiceAccessURI" }, Description (
103 "This is a URL that provides the protocol, network location, "
104 "and other service-specific information required in order to "
105 "access the service. It is deprecated with the "
106 tony 1.1 "recommendation that ServiceAccessURI be instantiated "
107 "instead. This new class correctly positions the semantics "
108 "of the service access, and clarifies the format of the "
109 "information.")]
110 string ServiceURL;
111
112 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
113 "This is a free-form array of strings that specify any "
114 "specific pre-conditions that must be met in order for this "
115 "service to start correctly. It was expected that subclasses "
116 "would refine the inherited StartService() method to suit "
117 "their specific needs. To-date, this refinement has not been "
118 "necessary. Also, the property is not very useful, since it "
119 "is not standardized. If this was a necessary construct, "
120 "then it would be required higher in the inheritance "
121 "hierarchy (on Service). The latter has not proven true. "
122 "Therefore, the property is deprecated.")]
123 string StartupConditions [ ];
124
125 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
126 "This is a free-form array of strings that specify any "
127 tony 1.1 "specific parameters that must be supplied to the "
128 "StartService() method in order for this service to start "
129 "correctly. It was expected that subclasses would refine the "
130 "inherited StartService() methods to suit their specific "
131 "needs. To-date, this refinement has not been necessary. If "
132 "indeed the method were refined, then its parameters would "
133 "more formally convey this information. Therefore, the "
134 "property is deprecated.")]
135 string StartupParameters [ ];
136 };
137
138
139 // ==================================================================
140 // NetworkServicesInAdminDomain
141 // ==================================================================
142 [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_HostedDependency" },
143 Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
144 "This association establishes the Dependency relationships that "
145 "exist between an administrative domain and the Network "
146 "Services that it hosts. It is deprecated since AdminDomains "
147 "can contain any ManagedSystemElements. There is no special "
148 tony 1.1 "relationship needed for NetworkServices. In addition, the Min "
149 "(1) cardinality on AdminDomain is not valid - since it may not "
150 "be possible to define every NetworkService in the context of "
151 "one or more Domains.")]
152 class CIM_NetworkServicesInAdminDomain : CIM_HostedDependency {
153
154 [Deprecated { "CIM_Dependency.Antecedent" },
155 Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
156 "The AdminDomain that hosts and administers the various "
157 "network services.")]
158 CIM_AdminDomain REF Antecedent;
159
160 [Deprecated { "CIM_Dependency.Dependent" },
161 Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
162 "The network service that is hosted in the administrative "
163 "domain.")]
164 CIM_NetworkService REF Dependent;
165 };
166
167
168 // ==================================================================
169 tony 1.1 // LogicalNetworkService
170 // ==================================================================
171 [Association, Deprecated { "No value" }, Version ( "2.7.0" ),
172 Description (
173 "A LogicalNetworkService represents network services that "
174 "either originate and/or terminate in a LogicalNetwork. This "
175 "association is deprecated since LogicalNetworks aggregate "
176 "ProtocolEndpoints, not their backing Services.")]
177 class CIM_LogicalNetworkService {
178
179 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Key, Description (
180 "The LogicalNetwork that contains the network service.")]
181 CIM_LogicalNetwork REF Network;
182
183 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Key, Description (
184 "The NetworkService that is running in the LogicalNetwork.")]
185 CIM_NetworkService REF NetworkService;
186
187 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
188 "An enumeration that explicitly defines this network service "
189 "as originating, terminating, or residing in this "
190 tony 1.1 "LogicalNetwork."),
191 ValueMap { "0", "1", "2", "3" },
192 Values { "Unknown", "Originates In", "Terminates In",
193 "Resides In" }]
194 uint16 ContainmentType;
195 };
196
197
198 // ==================================================================
199 // ForwardingService
200 // ==================================================================
201 [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
202 "This class represents the functions used in forwarding network "
203 "traffic. Its instances act on packets received from one or "
204 "more ProtocolEndpoints or Services, and drop (discard), or "
205 "send those packets to one or more other ProtocolEndpoints or "
206 "Services. The explicit Endpoints being forwarded between, are "
207 "described using the ForwardsAmong association (or one of its "
208 "subclasses). Generally, the Endpoints are at the same protocol "
209 "layer and are usually of similar types, or of the same type. "
210 "ForwardingService is different than RouteCalculation Service "
211 tony 1.1 "in that it represents the function of forwarding traffic "
212 "independent of calculating routing information. \n"
213 "\n"
214 "Examining the ForwardingService class definition, note that "
215 "its superclass NetworkService is deprecated. Therefore, "
216 "NetworkService's properties need not be implemented in an "
217 "instance of ForwardingService. Unfortunately, NetworkService "
218 "cannot be removed from the object hierarchy without a major "
219 "Schema release. When/if this occurs, the NetworkService "
220 "superclass will be removed, and ForwardingService will "
221 "subclass from CIM_Service directly. Also note that there are a "
222 "large number of additional protocols that are not currently "
223 "modeled. These will be added over time.")]
224 class CIM_ForwardingService : CIM_NetworkService {
225
226 [Description (
227 "This defines the type of protocol that is being forwarded."),
228 ValueMap { "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9",
229 "10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "16", "17", "18", "19" },
230 Values { "Unknown", "Other", "IPv4", "IPv6", "IPv4/IPv6", "IPX",
231 "AppleTalk", "DECnet", "SNA", "CONP", "CLNP", "VINES", "XNS",
232 tony 1.1 "ATM", "Frame Relay", "Ethernet", "TokenRing", "FDDI",
233 "Infiniband", "Fibre Channel" },
234 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_ForwardingService.OtherProtocolType"
235 }]
236 uint16 ProtocolType;
237
238 [Description (
239 "This defines the type of protocol that is being forwarded "
240 "when the value of the ProtocolType attribute is 1 (i.e., "
241 "\"Other\"). This provides for future extensibility."),
242 MaxLen ( 32 ),
243 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_ForwardingService.ProtocolType" }]
244 string OtherProtocolType;
245 };
246
247
248 // ==================================================================
249 // ForwardsAmong
250 // ==================================================================
251 [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description (
252 "This association represents the dependency that exists between "
253 tony 1.1 "the ProtocolEndpoints that are used to forward data and the "
254 "ForwardingService that is performing the forwarding of data.")]
255 class CIM_ForwardsAmong : CIM_ServiceSAPDependency {
256
257 [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
258 "The ProtocolEndpoints that are used to forward the data.")]
259 CIM_ProtocolEndpoint REF Antecedent;
260
261 [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
262 "The service that is forwarding the data.")]
263 CIM_ForwardingService REF Dependent;
264 };
265
266
267 // ==================================================================
268 // HostedForwardingServices
269 // ==================================================================
270 [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService" },
271 Version ( "2.7.1" ), Description (
272 "This is a specialization of CIM_HostedService, which is an "
273 "association between a Service and the System on which the "
274 tony 1.1 "functionality resides. The class, HostedForwardingServices, is "
275 "deprecated since it provides no additional semantics over "
276 "HostedService, and unecessarily restricts the Service to a "
277 "single ComputerSystem, when the Service could reside in a "
278 "Network or other higher level System.")]
279 class CIM_HostedForwardingServices : CIM_HostedService {
280
281 [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Antecedent" },
282 Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ),
283 Description (
284 "The hosting router.")]
285 CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;
286
287 [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Dependent" },
288 Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
289 "The Service hosted on the System.")]
290 CIM_ForwardingService REF Dependent;
291 };
292
293
294 // ==================================================================
295 tony 1.1 // RouteCalculationService
296 // ==================================================================
297 [Abstract, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
298 "This is an abstract base class, derived from Service, that "
299 "represents the route calculation aspects of a system. This "
300 "class also addresses functions performed by the system when it "
301 "exchanges routing information. \n"
302 "\n"
303 "Examining the RouteCalculationService class definition, note "
304 "that its superclass NetworkService is deprecated. Therefore, "
305 "NetworkService's properties need not be implemented in an "
306 "instance of RouteCalculationService. Unfortunately, "
307 "NetworkService cannot be removed from the object hierarchy "
308 "without a major Schema release. When/if this occurs, the "
309 "NetworkService superclass will be removed, and "
310 "RouteCalculationService will subclass from CIM_Service "
311 "directly. Also note that there are a large number of "
312 "additional routing protocols that are not currently modeled. "
313 "These will be added over time.")]
314 class CIM_RouteCalculationService : CIM_NetworkService {
315
316 tony 1.1 [Description (
317 "The RouterID uniquely identifies the router that is "
318 "performing the route calculation. It is the highest IP "
319 "address on the router (or the highest loopback interface, "
320 "if there is one).")]
321 string RouterID;
322
323 [Description (
324 "This is an enumerated value that defines the routing "
325 "algorithm used in this route calculation."),
326 ValueMap { "0", "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8" },
327 Values { "Unknown", "RIPv1", "RIPv2", "OSPFv1", "OSPFv2",
328 "BGPv1", "BGPv2", "BGPv3", "BGPv4" }]
329 uint16 AlgorithmType;
330 };
331
332
333 // ==================================================================
334 // CalculatesAmong
335 // ==================================================================
336 [Association, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
337 tony 1.1 "This is a specialization of the ServiceSAPDependency "
338 "association, indicating that the referenced ProtocolEndpoint "
339 "is utilized by the RouteCalculationService to provide its "
340 "functionality.")]
341 class CIM_CalculatesAmong : CIM_ServiceSAPDependency {
342
343 [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Description (
344 "The required ProtocolEndpoint.")]
345 CIM_ProtocolEndpoint REF Antecedent;
346
347 [Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
348 "The RouteCalculationService, which is dependent on the "
349 "underlying ProtocolEndpoint.")]
350 CIM_RouteCalculationService REF Dependent;
351
352 [Deprecated { "No value" }, Description (
353 "TRUE indicates that this ProtocolEndpoint represents a "
354 "static route, and FALSE means that it represents a "
355 "dynamically-learned route. This property is deprecated "
356 "since a Service may use an Endpoint to output several "
357 "routes, some static and others dynamic.")]
358 tony 1.1 boolean IsStatic;
359 };
360
361
362 // ==================================================================
363 // HostedRoutingServices
364 // ==================================================================
365 [Association, Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService" },
366 Version ( "2.7.1" ), Description (
367 "This is a specialization of CIM_HostedService, which is an "
368 "association between a Service and the System on which the "
369 "functionality resides. The class, HostedRoutingServices, is "
370 "deprecated since it provides no additional semantics over "
371 "HostedService, and unecessarily restricts the Service to a "
372 "single ComputerSystem, when the Service could reside in a "
373 "Network or other higher level System.")]
374 class CIM_HostedRoutingServices : CIM_HostedService {
375
376 [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Antecedent" },
377 Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ),
378 Description (
379 tony 1.1 "The hosting router.")]
380 CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;
381
382 [Deprecated { "CIM_HostedService.Dependent" },
383 Override ( "Dependent" ), Description (
384 "The Service hosted on the System.")]
385 CIM_RouteCalculationService REF Dependent;
386 };
387
388
389 // ====================================================================
390 // RoutingProtocolDomain
391 // ====================================================================
392 [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
393 "A Routing Protocol Domain is a collection of routers which "
394 "coordinate their routing knowledge using a single [instance of "
395 "a] routing protocol. This class represents the "
396 "area/layer/level/zone like property of a routing protocol, "
397 "such as an OSPF (area), IS-IS (layer) or PNNI (level). It does "
398 "not represent the entire routing domain in every case. For "
399 "example for OSPF, it represents an Area, but in the case of "
400 tony 1.1 "RIP, it represents the whole RIP domain. Any common attributes "
401 "of these routing domains can be placed in this class in future "
402 "versions of CIM.")]
403 class CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain : CIM_AdminDomain {
404 };
405
406
407 // ====================================================================
408 // RoutingProtocolDomainInAS
409 // ====================================================================
410 [Association, Aggregation, Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
411 "This assocation connects an AutonomousSystem to the routing "
412 "domains that it contains.")]
413 class CIM_RoutingProtocolDomainInAS : CIM_ContainedDomain {
414
415 [Aggregate, Override ( "GroupComponent" ), Max ( 1 ),
416 Description (
417 "The autonomous system.")]
418 CIM_AutonomousSystem REF GroupComponent;
419
420 [Override ( "PartComponent" ), Description (
421 tony 1.1 "The routing domain.")]
422 CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain REF PartComponent;
423 };
424
425
426 // ==================================================================
427 // RoutingPolicy
428 // ==================================================================
429 [Version ( "2.7.0" ), Description (
430 "This class is used to implement routing policies. It "
431 "aggregates a set of FilterLists, along with other appropriate "
432 "constructs, into a unit. One of the most important uses of "
433 "this class is to change the routing policy by changing values "
434 "of various attributes in a consistent manner. \n"
435 "\n"
436 "A RoutingPolicy is weak to the network device (i.e., the "
437 "ComputerSystem) that contains it. Hence, the ComputerSystem "
438 "keys are propagated to this class. \n"
439 "\n"
440 "Note that this class was defined before the Policy Model and "
441 "hence is not positioned in that hierarchy. The class will be "
442 tony 1.1 "repositioned in a later release of the Network Model.")]
443 class CIM_RoutingPolicy : CIM_LogicalElement {
444
445 [Key, Propagated ( "CIM_ComputerSystem.CreationClassName" ),
446 Description (
447 "The scoping ComputerSystem's CreationClassName."),
448 MaxLen ( 256 )]
449 string SystemCreationClassName;
450
451 [Key, Propagated ( "CIM_ComputerSystem.Name" ), Description (
452 "The scoping ComputerSystem's Name."),
453 MaxLen ( 256 )]
454 string SystemName;
455
456 [Key, Description (
457 "CreationClassName indicates the name of the class or the "
458 "subclass used in the creation of an instance. When used "
459 "with the other key properties of this class, this property "
460 "allows all instances of this class and its subclasses to be "
461 "uniquely identified."),
462 MaxLen ( 256 )]
463 tony 1.1 string CreationClassName;
464
465 [Key, Override ( "Name" ), Description (
466 "This is the name of the Routing Policy."),
467 MaxLen ( 256 )]
468 string Name;
469
470 [Description (
471 "This defines the type of action that will be performed if "
472 "the match conditions of the policy are met. The match "
473 "conditions are defined by the associated ListsIn "
474 "RoutingPolicy. There are essentially three choices: forward "
475 "the traffic unmodified, forward the traffic but modify "
476 "either the attributes describing the route and/or other "
477 "attributes that define how to condition the traffic (e.g., "
478 "its ToS byte settings), or prevent the traffic from being "
479 "forwarded."),
480 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9" },
481 Values { "Accept As Is",
482 "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes",
483 "Accept and Remark Packet",
484 tony 1.1 "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes and Remark",
485 "Accept With Other Action",
486 "Accept With Protocol Attribute Changes and Other Action",
487 "Accept with Remark and Other Action",
488 "Accept with Protocol Attribute Changes, Remark and Other "
489 "Action", "Deny" }]
490 uint16 Action;
491
492 [Description (
493 "This controls whether protocol-specific attributes replace, "
494 "get prepended, or get appended to their existing values."),
495 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3" },
496 Values { "Replace", "Prepend", "Append" },
497 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.BGPAction" }]
498 uint16 AttributeAction;
499
500 [Description (
501 "This defines one or more BGP-specific attributes that "
502 "should be used to modify this routing update."),
503 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10" },
504 Values { "Origin", "AS_Path", "NEXT_HOP", "Multi_Exit_Disc",
505 tony 1.1 "Local_Pref", "Atomic_Aggregate", "Aggregator", "Community",
506 "Originator_ID", "Cluster_List" },
507 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.BGPValue" }]
508 uint16 BGPAction;
509
510 [Description (
511 "The value for the corresponding BGPAction."),
512 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.BGPAction" }]
513 string BGPValue;
514
515 [Description (
516 "This defines a remarking action for this traffic."),
517 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7" },
518 Values { "Change DSCP", "Change ToS", "Change 802.1Q Value",
519 "Change CIR", "Change CBR", "Change ABR", "Change VBR" },
520 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.RemarkValue" }]
521 uint16 RemarkAction;
522
523 [Description (
524 "The value for the corresponding RemarkAction."),
525 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.RemarkAction" }]
526 tony 1.1 string RemarkValue;
527
528 [Description (
529 "This defines another action to be taken for this traffic."),
530 ValueMap { "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7" },
531 Values { "Other", "Input Flow Policing", "Output Flow Policing",
532 "Input Aggregate Policing", "Output Aggregate Policing",
533 "Police By Marking Down", "Police By Dropping Down" },
534 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningValue",
535 "CIM_RoutingPolicy.OtherConditioningAction" }]
536 uint16 ConditioningAction;
537
538 [Description (
539 "If the value of the ConditioningAction property of this "
540 "class is 1, this contains an application-specific type of "
541 "conditioning that is to be performed. Otherwise, if the "
542 "ConditioningAction property is any other value, the value "
543 "of this property should be NULL."),
544 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningAction" }]
545 string OtherConditioningAction;
546
547 tony 1.1 [Description (
548 "The value for the corresponding ConditioningAction, if "
549 "appropriate."),
550 ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_RoutingPolicy.ConditioningAction" }]
551 string ConditioningValue;
552 };
553
554
555 // ==================================================================
556 // HostedRoutingPolicy
557 // ==================================================================
558 [Association, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description (
559 "A RoutingPolicy is weak to the network device (i.e., the "
560 "ComputerSystem) that contains it. This association formalizes "
561 "that relationship.")]
562 class CIM_HostedRoutingPolicy : CIM_HostedDependency {
563
564 [Override ( "Antecedent" ), Min ( 1 ), Max ( 1 ), Description (
565 "The network device/computer system that scopes the "
566 "RoutingPolicy.")]
567 CIM_ComputerSystem REF Antecedent;
568 tony 1.1
569 [Override ( "Dependent" ), Weak, Description (
570 "The routing policy defined in the context of the network "
571 "device.")]
572 CIM_RoutingPolicy REF Dependent;
573 };
574
575
576 // ==================================================================
577 // ListsInRoutingPolicy
578 // ==================================================================
579 [Association, Aggregation, Version ( "2.6.0" ), Description (
580 "This is a specialization of the CIM_Component aggregation "
581 "which is used to define a set of FilterLists that are "
582 "aggregated by a particular RoutingPolicy.")]
583 class CIM_ListsInRoutingPolicy : CIM_Component {
584
585 [Aggregate, Override ( "GroupComponent" ), Description (
586 "The RoutingPolicy, which aggregates the set of FilterLists.")]
587 CIM_RoutingPolicy REF GroupComponent;
588
589 tony 1.1 [Override ( "PartComponent" ), Description (
590 "A FilterList, which is part-of the RoutingPolicy.")]
591 CIM_FilterList REF PartComponent;
592
593 [Description (
594 "The position of the FilterList relative to all other "
595 "entries in the RoutingPolicy.")]
596 uint16 ListSequence;
597 };
598
599
600 // ===================================================================
601 // end of file
602 // ===================================================================
|
Return to
Network28_RoutingForwarding.mof
CVS log
Up to [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIM28