version 1.1.2.1, 2012/01/24 13:50:36
|
version 1.1.2.2, 2012/02/15 17:46:56
|
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) 2005 DMTF. All rights reserved. |
|
// <change cr="ArchCR00066.004" type="add">Add UmlPackagePath |
|
// qualifier values to CIM Schema.</change> |
|
// ================================================================== |
|
// CIM_ElementAsUser |
|
// ================================================================== |
|
[Association, Deprecated { "CIM_AssignedIdentity" }, |
|
Version ( "2.8.0" ), |
|
UMLPackagePath ( "CIM::User::UsersAccess" ), |
|
Description ( |
|
"CIM_ElementAsUser is an association used to establish the " |
|
"\'ownership\' of UsersAccess object instances. That is, the " |
|
"ManagedElement may have UsersAccess to systems and, therefore, " |
|
"be \'users\' on those systems. UsersAccess instances must have " |
|
"an \'owning\' ManagedElement. Typically, the ManagedElements " |
|
"will be limited to Collection, Person, Service and " |
|
"ServiceAccessPoint. Other non-human ManagedElements that might " |
|
"be thought of as having UsersAccess (e.g., a device or system) " |
|
"have services that have the UsersAccess. \n" |
|
"\n" |
|
"Since the UsersAccess class is deprecated in lieu of " |
|
"CIM_Identity, this association is also deprecated and replaced " |
|
"by one of similar semantics, AssignedIdentity. It should be " |
|
"noted that the new class is NOT defined as a Dependency " |
|
"relationship, since it was felt that the association was not " |
|
"truly a dependency of the element on its access." )] |
|
class CIM_ElementAsUser : CIM_Dependency { |
|
|
|
[Deprecated { "CIM_AssignedIdentity.ManagedElement" }, |
|
Override ( "Antecedent" ), |
|
Min ( 1 ), |
|
Max ( 1 ), |
|
Description ( "The ManagedElement that has UsersAccess." )] |
|
CIM_ManagedElement REF Antecedent; |
|
|
|
[Deprecated { "CIM_AssignedIdentity.IdentityInfo" }, |
|
Override ( "Dependent" ), |
|
Description ( "The \'owned\' UsersAccess." )] |
|
CIM_UsersAccess REF Dependent; |
|
|
|
|
|
}; |