![]() ![]() |
![]() |
File: [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIM231 / DMTF / Network / CIM_OSPFArea.mof
(download)
Revision: 1.1, Tue Jan 24 13:50:20 2012 UTC (12 years, 5 months ago) by marek Branch: MAIN CVS Tags: preBug9676, postBug9676, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-root, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-branch, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-root, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-branch, TASK-PEP317_pullop-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP317_pullop-merged_in_to_trunk, RELEASE_2_14_1, RELEASE_2_14_0-RC2, RELEASE_2_14_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_14_0, RELEASE_2_14-root, RELEASE_2_14-branch, RELEASE_2_13_0-RC2, RELEASE_2_13_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_13_0-FC, RELEASE_2_13_0, RELEASE_2_13-root, RELEASE_2_13-branch, RELEASE_2_12_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_12_1, RELEASE_2_12_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_12_0-FC, RELEASE_2_12_0, RELEASE_2_12-root, RELEASE_2_12-branch, HEAD, CIMRS_WORK_20130824 Branch point for: TASK-PEP317_pullop-branch BUG#:9155 TITLE: Upgrade Pegasus to Include the CIM 2.31 Schema in CVS DESCRIPTION: |
// Copyright (c) 2005 DMTF. All rights reserved. // <change cr="ArchCR00066.004" type="add">Add UmlPackagePath // qualifier values to CIM Schema.</change> // ================================================================== // CIM_OSPFArea // ================================================================== [Version ( "2.7.0" ), UMLPackagePath ( "CIM::Network::OSPF" ), Description ( "This class represents an OSPF area. The definition of an OSPF " "area from RFC2328, is \'OSPF allows sets of networks to be " "grouped together. Such a grouping is called an area. The " "topology of an area is hidden from the rest of the Autonomous " "System. This information hiding enables a significant " "reduction in routing traffic. Also, routing within the area is " "determined only by the area\'s own topology, lending the area " "protection from bad routing data.\' This class has a \'Type\' " "propery, which distinguishes between the different area types. " "This approach was chosen, because it provides a simpler way to " "indicate the type of an area, and additional subclassing is " "not needed at this time." )] class CIM_OSPFArea : CIM_RoutingProtocolDomain { [Description ( "The area ID of this OSPF area, see C.2 in RFC 2328." ), MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfAreaId" }] uint32 AreaID; [Required, Description ( "The type of the OSPF area." ), ValueMap { "2", "3", "4" }, Values { "Plain", "Stub", "NSSA" }] uint16 AreaType; [Description ( "When the number of non-default AS-external-LSAs in a " "router\'s link-state database reaches this limit, the " "router enters OverflowState, see 2.1 in RFC 1765." ), MappingStrings { "MIB.IETF|OSPF-MIB.ospfExtLsdbLimit" }] uint32 ExtLsdbLimit; };
No CVS admin address has been configured |
Powered by ViewCVS 0.9.2 |