![]() ![]() |
![]() |
File: [Pegasus] / pegasus / Schemas / CIM231 / DMTF / Application / CIM_J2eeJVM.mof
(download)
Revision: 1.1, Tue Jan 24 13:49:56 2012 UTC (12 years, 5 months ago) by marek Branch: MAIN CVS Tags: preBug9676, postBug9676, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-root, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-TASK_PEP362_RestfulService_branch-branch, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-root, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_out_to_branch, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_in_to_trunk, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-merged_in_from_branch, TASK-PEP362_RestfulService-branch, TASK-PEP317_pullop-merged_out_from_trunk, TASK-PEP317_pullop-merged_in_to_trunk, RELEASE_2_14_1, RELEASE_2_14_0-RC2, RELEASE_2_14_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_14_0, RELEASE_2_14-root, RELEASE_2_14-branch, RELEASE_2_13_0-RC2, RELEASE_2_13_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_13_0-FC, RELEASE_2_13_0, RELEASE_2_13-root, RELEASE_2_13-branch, RELEASE_2_12_1-RC1, RELEASE_2_12_1, RELEASE_2_12_0-RC1, RELEASE_2_12_0-FC, RELEASE_2_12_0, RELEASE_2_12-root, RELEASE_2_12-branch, HEAD, CIMRS_WORK_20130824 Branch point for: TASK-PEP317_pullop-branch BUG#:9155 TITLE: Upgrade Pegasus to Include the CIM 2.31 Schema in CVS DESCRIPTION: |
// Copyright (c) 2008 DMTF. All rights reserved. [Version ( "2.19.0" ), UMLPackagePath ( "CIM::Application::J2eeAppServer" ), Description ( "The CIM_J2eeJVM class identifies a Java VM that is utilized by " "a J2EE server. For each Java VM that is running threads " "associated with the J2EE server, its containers or resources, " "there must be an instance in this class. The instance must be " "removed when the Java VM is no longer running. The reason this " "class subclasses from a class as high up in the hierarchy as " "CIM_EnabledLogicalElement is the absence of a class that " "models Interpreters, Emulators and the like. The JVM is not an " "OS, but then neither is it just a process. In v2.9, we hope to " "plug this hole by introducing a class that will model " "interpreters and emulators. At this point, the JVM class can " "be pushed down in the hierarchy." )] class CIM_J2eeJVM : CIM_EnabledLogicalElement { [Key, Override ( "InstanceID" ), Description ( "InstanceID identifies a unique instance of a J2ee JVM In " "order to ensure uniqueness, the value of InstanceID MUST " "be constructed using the form specified in JSR77.3.1.1.1 " "in order to avoid the need for manual key propagation." ), ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_J2eeJVM.Name" }] string InstanceID; [Override ( "Name" ), Description ( "The name of a J2EE JVM. The name MUST be constructed " "using the form specified in JSR77.3.1.1.1 in order to " "avoid the need for manual key propagation." ), MaxLen ( 256 ), MappingStrings { "JSR77.JCP|JSR77.3.1.1.1 objectName|V1.0" }, ModelCorrespondence { "CIM_J2eeJVM.InstanceID" }] string Name; [Description ( "The Java Runtime Environment version of the JVM." ), MappingStrings { "JSR77.JCP|JSR77.3.4.1.1 javaVersion|V1.0" }] string JavaVersion; [Description ( "The Java Runtime Environment vendor of the JVM." ), MappingStrings { "JSR77.JCP|JSR77.3.4.1.2 javaVendor|V1.0" }] string JavaVendor; [Description ( "The node (machine) this JVM is running on." ), MappingStrings { "JSR77.JCP|JSR77.3.4.1.3 node|V1.0" }] string Node; };
No CVS admin address has been configured |
Powered by ViewCVS 0.9.2 |